From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23959 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2010 09:33:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 23950 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Nov 2010 09:33:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_BP X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 14 Nov 2010 09:32:26 +0000 From: "hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/40436] [4.5/4.6 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.5.2 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:07:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg01794.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436 --- Comment #42 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-14 09:27:09 UTC --- Fixing little bug in unreachable function removal and working around PR46470 gets me to: -2933 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformfs/ext3/superb 8069 -1572 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformdrivers/char/n_ttyb 6038 -1385 teem-1.6.0-srcsrc/limn/test/soidb 5396 -1267 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformfs/ext3/iallocb 2582 -1203 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformmm/filemapb 15592 -1057 teem-1.6.0-srcsrc/limn/test/tpsb 4159 -1010 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformfs/ext3/inodeb 12315 -843 teem-1.6.0-srcsrc/ell/quatb 11314 -834 cg_compiler_opensrcsupportb 27636 -828 OpenTCP-1.0.4ethernetb 1495 -820 teem-1.6.0-srcsrc/nrrd/winKernelb 16288 -807 teem-1.6.0-srcsrc/nrrd/measureb 9444 -677 jikespg-1.3src/ctabsb 48223 -656 teem-1.6.0-srcsrc/echo/test/trendb 9744 -619 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformmm/memoryb 8051 -605 bzip2-1.0.2decompressb 8454 -595 teem-1.6.0-srcsrc/nrrd/kernelb 21446 -586 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformfs/nfsd/vfsb 9082 -582 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformfs/ext3/ballocb 4095 -572 teem-1.6.0-srcsrc/echo/colorb 7500 -546 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformfs/bufferb 14617 -521 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformnet/ipv4/igmpb 12205 -511 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformnet/core/devb 11233 -462 libpng-1.2.5pngrtranb 21062 -427 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformfs/nfs/writeb 6586 -419 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformfs/nameib 11526 -414 teem-1.6.0-srcsrc/ten/tendSatinb 5479 -404 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformfs/jbd/transactionb 10746 -387 teem-1.6.0-srcsrc/echo/intxb 10122 -380 teem-1.6.0-srcsrc/mite/rayb 3376 -357 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformfs/jbd/journalb 9266 -349 cg_compiler_opensrcprintutilsb 12377 -340 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformfs/namespaceb 5715 -317 teem-1.6.0-srcsrc/limn/qnb 2544 -311 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformnet/ipv4/tcp_minisocksb 5169 -306 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformnet/sunrpc/xprtb 8042 -291 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformnet/netlink/af_netlinkb 5792 -289 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformlib/vsprintfb 4266 -286 linux-2.4.23-pre3-testplatformnet/sunrpc/svcsockb 6488 -274 compilervasb 6631 What surprise me is that so far there was no inliner (or size estimate) related problems... Does the ARM regression reported still exist? I suppose the fact that we do see regression at our x86_64 CSiBE testing might be just because of the unforunate 8 page alignments in the kernel.