[Bug bootstrap/40516] --without-mpc, --without-ppl, --without-cloog does the same thing. No turning off mpc via configure.

[Bug bootstrap/40516] --without-mpc, --without-ppl, --without-cloog does the same thing. No turning off mpc via configure.

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40516

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to nightstrike from comment #6)
> Is it supported to build GCC without MPC?

NO.  GCC requires mpc to build.

Also cloog/ppl support has been removed and replaced with ISL.

Toplevel configure.ac has now:
# Treat --without-isl as a request to disable
# GRAPHITE support and skip all following checks.

So I am going to assume this was fixed for ISL and MPC needs to be there and
CLOOG and PPL support was removed.

So closing as works for me.

[Bug bootstrap/40516] --without-mpc, --without-ppl, --without-cloog does the same thing. No turning off mpc via configure.

[manu at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-22 05:19 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> How come this is still sitting unconfirmed? This is something that involves
> Linux et. al. Using --without-cloog, ppl, or mpc doesn't work right as per
> previous post, so it is more than just cosmetic. 

Presumably, because GCC devs haven't had time to look at this in detail and it
is not a priority compared to other issues. Note that at this moment there are
1288 unconfirmed bugs.

> I don't really care personally, just trying to help gcc.

Thanks, any help is greatly appreciated.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40516

[Bug bootstrap/40516] --without-mpc, --without-ppl, --without-cloog does the same thing. No turning off mpc via configure.

[xenofears at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #4 from xenofears at gmail dot com  2009-07-22 04:57 -------
How come this is still sitting unconfirmed? This is something that involves
Linux et. al. Using --without-cloog, ppl, or mpc doesn't work right as per
previous post, so it is more than just cosmetic. 

I don't really care personally, just trying to help gcc.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40516

[Bug bootstrap/40516] --without-mpc, --without-ppl, --without-cloog does the same thing. No turning off mpc via configure.

[xenofears at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #3 from xenofears at gmail dot com  2009-06-30 07:38 -------
I have now, in an attempt at a testcase, have found this bug to have further
implications. Trying to turn off mpc, ppl, and/or cloog has the same behavior,
i.e. --without-mpc causes:

gmpinc: '-I/no/include'
gmplibs: '-L/no/lib -lmpc -lmpfr -lgmp'

This is more serious now as mpc cannot be turned off without manual hacking. I
am surprized this has not yet been confirmed. I can also now say that target
x86_64-linux-unknown-gnu produces the same problem. It is safe to say it is
fairly target indescriminate.


-- 

xenofears at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|using --with-cloog and --   |--without-mpc, --without-
                   |with-ppl without specifying |ppl, --without-cloog does
                   |a location with = causes    |the same thing. No turning
                   |configuration errors        |off mpc via configure.


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40516