public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ro at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/40702]  New: lto-elf.c fails to compile on Solaris
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-40702-279@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

Trying to build the lto branch as of 20090709 on Solaris (both SPARC and x86)
fails compiling lto-elf.c:

cc1: warnings being treated as errors
In file included from /vol/gcc/src/gcc-lto/gcc/lto/lto-elf.c:21:0:
/vol/gcc/include/libelf/gelf.h:102:1: error: function declaration isn't a
prototype

This happens because for some reason __STDC__ isn't defined at all (as revealed
by rebuilding with -g3 -save-temps), so libelf/libelf.h defines __P() as empty.
I've hacked around this by adding || defined(__sun) to the first __P definition
in libelf/gelf.h and libelf/libelf.h, but this needs to be properly
investigated.


-- 
           Summary: lto-elf.c fails to compile on Solaris
           Product: gcc
           Version: lto
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
  GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.11
GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.11


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40702


             reply	other threads:[~2009-07-09 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-09 19:10 ro at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2009-10-03 22:12 ` [Bug lto/40702] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-05 12:56 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2009-10-05 13:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-05 14:05 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
2010-04-23 14:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-23 18:09 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-28 11:16 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-04-28 11:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-28 13:02 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-28 14:41 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-06-03 13:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-04 15:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-24 16:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-40702-279@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).