From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9779 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2009 20:51:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 9740 invoked by uid 48); 9 Jul 2009 20:51:14 -0000 Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:51:00 -0000 Subject: [Bug testsuite/40704] New: ^M? in testsuite log leads to binary attachment X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Message-ID: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00829.txt.bz2 Some gcc test results contain binary attachment: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-07/msg00830.html The problem is "^M?" in === libffi tests === Running target unix/-m32 XPASS: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, 1.0 2.0^M? XPASS: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O2 output pattern test, 1.0 2.0^M? XPASS: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O3 output pattern test, 1.0 2.0^M? XPASS: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -Os output pattern test, 1.0 2.0^M? XPASS: libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pattern test, 1.0 2.0^M? === libffi Summary for unix/-m32 === They come from /* { dg-output "1.0 2.0\n" { xfail x86_64-*-linux-* } } */ in libffi.call/cls_dbls_struct.c. -- Summary: ^M? in testsuite log leads to binary attachment Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: testsuite AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40704