From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-288551-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 557 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2009 17:45:50 -0000
Received: (qmail 462 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jul 2009 17:45:39 -0000
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 17:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug lto/40721]  New: [LTO] complains about two tentative definitions
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-40721-10053@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg00932.txt.bz2

This breaks a lot of benchmarks in SPEC CPU 2000.

t.c

int i;

t2.c

int i;
int main() { return i; }

$ ./xgcc -B. -o t t1.c t2.c
$ ./xgcc -B. -o t t1.c t2.c -flto
t2.c:1:5: error: 'i' has already been defined
t1.c:1:5: error: previously defined here
lto-wrapper: ././xgcc returned 1 exit status
collect2: lto-wrapper returned 1 exit status

the LTO behavior is wrong for C.  The testcase would violate the C++ ODR, but
LTO should not reject the valid C program (note ODR violations do not need to
be diagnosed).


-- 
           Summary: [LTO] complains about two tentative definitions
           Product: gcc
           Version: lto
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: rejects-valid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: lto
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40721