From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-288800-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8322 invoked by alias); 14 Jul 2009 23:18:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 8185 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jul 2009 23:17:52 -0000
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 23:18:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug fortran/40756]  New: Cleanup TREE_BLOCK
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-40756-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-07/txt/msg01181.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg00822.html

I was wrong when I thought TREE_BLOCKs were only attached to
DECL_INITIAL for current_function_decl.  They are also reachable
from EXPRs embedded in some types emitted by Fortran.

These are pretty useless, so perhaps it'd be a good idea to clean
them up in Fortran's free_lang_data langhook, but letting them
through the streamer is harmless.


-- 
           Summary: Cleanup TREE_BLOCK
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40756