public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/40762]  New: possible integer miscompilation
@ 2009-07-15  6:33 regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
  2009-07-15  7:46 ` [Bug c/40762] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: regehr at cs dot utah dot edu @ 2009-07-15  6:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Seen on Ubuntu Hardy.  The -O2 result seems to be wrong.  Also valgrind says
this about the -O2 compilation:

==6729== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==6729==    at 0x84F22CB: solve_graph (tree-ssa-structalias.c:1570)



regehr@john-home:~/volatile/tmp174$ current-gcc -O1 small.c -o small
regehr@john-home:~/volatile/tmp174$ ./small
checksum = 0
regehr@john-home:~/volatile/tmp174$ current-gcc -O2 small.c -o small
regehr@john-home:~/volatile/tmp174$ ./small
checksum = 1
regehr@john-home:~/volatile/tmp174$ current-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/home/regehr/z/tmp/gcc-r149650-install
--program-prefix=r149650- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.5.0 20090714 (experimental) (GCC) 
regehr@john-home:~/volatile/tmp174$ cat small.c
#include <stdint.h>
#include <limits.h>
#include <stdio.h>

uint8_t g_4;
int64_t g_10;
uint8_t g_56;
uint8_t g_64;

static uint8_t safe_rshift_func_uint8_t_u_u(uint8_t left, unsigned int right)
{
  return ((((unsigned int)(right)) >= sizeof(uint8_t)*CHAR_BIT)
          ? ((uint8_t)(left))
          : (((uint8_t)(left)) >> ((unsigned int)(right))));
}

int32_t func_53 (void);
int32_t func_53 (void)
{
  if (safe_rshift_func_uint8_t_u_u (g_56, g_10))
    {
    }
  else
    for (g_10 = 0; g_10; g_10 = 1)
      {
      }
  return 1;
}

int32_t func_36 (void);
int32_t func_36 (void)
{
  uint8_t p_40;
  g_10 = 1;
  g_10 && func_53 ();
  p_40 = g_10 || g_4;
  g_64 = g_10;
  return 1;
}

int
main (void)
{
  func_36 ();
  printf ("checksum = %d\n", g_64);
  return 0;
}


-- 
           Summary: possible integer miscompilation
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40762


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/40762] possible integer miscompilation
  2009-07-15  6:33 [Bug c/40762] New: possible integer miscompilation regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
@ 2009-07-15  7:46 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-07-15 10:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-07-15  7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-15 07:46 -------
Richi, this looks like it should go into your bucket of things to look at:
==6729== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==6729==    at 0x84F22CB: solve_graph (tree-ssa-structalias.c:1570)


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40762


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/40762] possible integer miscompilation
  2009-07-15  6:33 [Bug c/40762] New: possible integer miscompilation regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
  2009-07-15  7:46 ` [Bug c/40762] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-07-15 10:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-07-15 10:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-07-15 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-15 10:09 -------
Confirmed.  With -O2 -fno-inline we get in .optimized

func_36 ()
{
<bb 2>:
  g_10 = 1;
  func_53 ();
  g_64 = 1;
  return 1;

FRE does this.  I'll check.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-07-15 10:09:19
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40762


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/40762] possible integer miscompilation
  2009-07-15  6:33 [Bug c/40762] New: possible integer miscompilation regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
  2009-07-15  7:46 ` [Bug c/40762] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-07-15 10:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-07-15 10:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-07-15 10:17 ` [Bug middle-end/40762] [4.5 Regression] CD-DCE messes up virtual SSA form rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-07 10:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-07-15 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2009-07-15 10:09:19         |2009-07-15 10:09:26
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40762


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/40762] [4.5 Regression] CD-DCE messes up virtual SSA form
  2009-07-15  6:33 [Bug c/40762] New: possible integer miscompilation regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-07-15 10:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-07-15 10:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-07 10:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-07-15 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-15 10:17 -------
We have wrong SSA form before FRE:

;; Function func_36 (func_36)

func_36 ()
{
  uint8_t g_64.8;
  int64_t g_10.5;

<bb 2>:
  # .MEM_17 = VDEF <.MEM_16(D)>
  g_10 = 1;
  # VUSE <.MEM_17>
  g_10.5_2 = g_10;
  if (g_10.5_2 != 0)
    goto <bb 3>;
  else
    goto <bb 4>;

<bb 3>:
  # .MEM_18 = VDEF <.MEM_17>
  func_53 ();

<bb 4>:
  # VUSE <.MEM_17>
  g_10.5_11 = g_10;
  g_64.8_12 = (uint8_t) g_10.5_11;
  # .MEM_19 = VDEF <.MEM_17>
  g_64 = g_64.8_12;
  return 1;

There is a PHI node missing to merge .MEM_18 and .MEM_17.

Which is caused by CD-DCE changes again.  Honza?


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot  |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |org                         |org
          Component|c                           |middle-end
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
           Priority|P3                          |P1
            Summary|possible integer            |[4.5 Regression] CD-DCE
                   |miscompilation              |messes up virtual SSA form
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40762


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/40762] [4.5 Regression] CD-DCE messes up virtual SSA form
  2009-07-15  6:33 [Bug c/40762] New: possible integer miscompilation regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-07-15 10:17 ` [Bug middle-end/40762] [4.5 Regression] CD-DCE messes up virtual SSA form rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-07 10:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-07 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-09-07 10:24 -------
Fixed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40762


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-07 10:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-15  6:33 [Bug c/40762] New: possible integer miscompilation regehr at cs dot utah dot edu
2009-07-15  7:46 ` [Bug c/40762] " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-15 10:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-15 10:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-15 10:17 ` [Bug middle-end/40762] [4.5 Regression] CD-DCE messes up virtual SSA form rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-07 10:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).