public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/40783] inefficient code to accumulate function return values
       [not found] <bug-40783-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2021-07-26  8:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-26  8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40783

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=28481,
                   |                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=27855

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
4.6 and above seems to be working.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/40783] inefficient code to accumulate function return values
  2009-07-17  6:56 [Bug target/40783] New: " carrot at google dot com
  2009-07-17  6:56 ` [Bug target/40783] " carrot at google dot com
  2009-07-27 15:05 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-12  1:17 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-12  1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40783


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/40783] inefficient code to accumulate function return values
  2009-07-17  6:56 [Bug target/40783] New: " carrot at google dot com
  2009-07-17  6:56 ` [Bug target/40783] " carrot at google dot com
@ 2009-07-27 15:05 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-12-12  1:17 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-07-27 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-07-27 15:05 -------
This seems to be related to the other reassoc + register pressure bugs reported
in the database. I am not sure if this is a dup of either PR28481 or PR27855
but they appear to be related.

With -fno-tree-reassoc I get the same code for both loops.

time_math:
        push    {r4, r5, r6, lr}
        bl      dumm
        mov     r4, #0
        mov     r6, #99
        add     r5, r0, #0
.L2:
        add     r0, r5, #0
        bl      __aeabi_f2iz
        add     r5, r5, #1
        add     r4, r4, r0
        add     r0, r5, #0
        bl      __aeabi_f2iz
        add     r5, r5, #1
        add     r4, r4, r0
        add     r0, r5, #0
        bl      __aeabi_f2iz
        add     r5, r5, #1
        add     r4, r4, r0
        add     r0, r5, #0
        bl      __aeabi_f2iz
        add     r5, r5, #1
        add     r4, r4, r0
        sub     r6, r6, #1
        bcs     .L2
        bl      dumm
        mov     r6, #99
        add     r5, r0, #0
.L3:
        add     r0, r5, #0
        bl      MyConvert
        add     r5, r5, #1
        add     r4, r4, r0
        add     r0, r5, #0
        bl      MyConvert
        add     r5, r5, #1
        add     r4, r4, r0
        add     r0, r5, #0
        bl      MyConvert
        add     r5, r5, #1
        add     r4, r4, r0
        add     r0, r5, #0
        bl      MyConvert
        add     r5, r5, #1
        add     r4, r4, r0
        sub     r6, r6, #1
        bcs     .L3
        mov     r0, r4
        @ sp needed for prologue
        pop     {r4, r5, r6, pc}
        .size   time_math, .-time_math
        .ident  "GCC: (GNU) 4.5.0 20090727 (experimental)"


-- 

ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-07-27 15:05:21
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40783


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/40783] inefficient code to accumulate function return values
  2009-07-17  6:56 [Bug target/40783] New: " carrot at google dot com
@ 2009-07-17  6:56 ` carrot at google dot com
  2009-07-27 15:05 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-12-12  1:17 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: carrot at google dot com @ 2009-07-17  6:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from carrot at google dot com  2009-07-17 06:56 -------
Created an attachment (id=18212)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18212&action=view)
test case


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40783


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-07-26  8:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-40783-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2021-07-26  8:07 ` [Bug target/40783] inefficient code to accumulate function return values pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2009-07-17  6:56 [Bug target/40783] New: " carrot at google dot com
2009-07-17  6:56 ` [Bug target/40783] " carrot at google dot com
2009-07-27 15:05 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-12  1:17 ` rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).