From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-339017-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12956 invoked by alias); 1 Dec 2010 00:14:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 12932 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Dec 2010 00:14:01 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:13:56 +0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/40793] "Error: no matching function for call to XYZ" doesn't display function-template-arguments
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-40793-4-sXuEYWucku@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-40793-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-40793-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 00:14:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D40793

--- Comment #10 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez <manu at gcc dot gn=
u.org> 2010-12-01 00:13:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> So with the example in comment #5, we get:
> t.cc: In function =E2=80=98void f()=E2=80=99:
> t.cc:5:31: error: no matching function for call to =E2=80=98staticPrint()=
=E2=80=99
> t.cc:2:18: note: candidate is: template<class T, T t> void staticPrint()
>=20
> --- CUT ---
> Is that good enough?

I don't think so. The problem is that looking at the error, one cannot say =
what
are the template arguments (which may be the result of something else). The
desired output is mentioned in comment #5.

Printing the candidates is of course an improvement.