* [Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc
2009-07-27 3:54 [Bug libgcj/40868] New: ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc dsdsdds at 126 dot com
@ 2009-09-01 12:04 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-01 14:06 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-01 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 12:03 -------
This sounds correct to me . Adding one of the libjava maintainers to comment on
this. Patches should be submitted to the correct mailing list.
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aph at redhat dot com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-09-01 12:03:59
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc
2009-07-27 3:54 [Bug libgcj/40868] New: ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc dsdsdds at 126 dot com
2009-09-01 12:04 ` [Bug libgcj/40868] " ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-01 14:06 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-01 16:58 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-01 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 14:06 -------
Assigning to Tom tromey: this is his area.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc
2009-07-27 3:54 [Bug libgcj/40868] New: ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc dsdsdds at 126 dot com
2009-09-01 12:04 ` [Bug libgcj/40868] " ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-01 14:06 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-01 16:58 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-01 17:09 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-01 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 16:58 -------
I think it isn't correct to use "gcc" directly.
You probably have to introduce a new variable.
But, I don't see why we need ecjx.cc at all.
I think it must be to work around some other problem.
Maybe instead we could just fix that problem directly.
Apparently it came in here, though I don't see why:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2008-q4/msg00067.html
See also PR 38396
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc
2009-07-27 3:54 [Bug libgcj/40868] New: ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc dsdsdds at 126 dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-09-01 16:58 ` tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-01 17:09 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-01 21:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: aph at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-01 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 17:09 -------
Hmm, I seem to have approved that patch.
I agree with you: I can't see why the specfile change requires ecjx.cc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc
2009-07-27 3:54 [Bug libgcj/40868] New: ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc dsdsdds at 126 dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-09-01 17:09 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-01 21:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-04 12:55 ` flameeyes at gentoo dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-01 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 21:38 -------
I believe libtool wasn't doing the right thing without any sources, but it has
been a while, so I don't remember the details.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc
2009-07-27 3:54 [Bug libgcj/40868] New: ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc dsdsdds at 126 dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-09-01 21:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-04 12:55 ` flameeyes at gentoo dot org
2009-12-10 15:25 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: flameeyes at gentoo dot org @ 2009-12-04 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from flameeyes at gentoo dot org 2009-12-04 12:54 -------
Created an attachment (id=19222)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19222&action=view)
Proposed patch
With this patch applied, gcj cross-builds fine (not a canadian cross though).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc
2009-07-27 3:54 [Bug libgcj/40868] New: ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc dsdsdds at 126 dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-04 12:55 ` flameeyes at gentoo dot org
@ 2009-12-10 15:25 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-10 8:56 ` bugtrack at roumenpetrov dot info
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-10 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-10 15:25 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> Created an attachment (id=19222)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19222&action=view) [edit]
> Proposed patch
>
> With this patch applied, gcj cross-builds fine (not a canadian cross though).
>
Please submit patches to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc
2009-07-27 3:54 [Bug libgcj/40868] New: ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc dsdsdds at 126 dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-10 15:25 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-07-10 8:56 ` bugtrack at roumenpetrov dot info
2010-07-10 8:57 ` bugtrack at roumenpetrov dot info
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugtrack at roumenpetrov dot info @ 2010-07-10 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from bugtrack at roumenpetrov dot info 2010-07-10 08:56 -------
Bug cannot be resolved with updates in libjava/Makefile. You could see my
comments in issue #40868 (clone of #30591)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc
2009-07-27 3:54 [Bug libgcj/40868] New: ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc dsdsdds at 126 dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-10 8:56 ` bugtrack at roumenpetrov dot info
@ 2010-07-10 8:57 ` bugtrack at roumenpetrov dot info
2010-08-27 4:28 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-27 4:30 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: bugtrack at roumenpetrov dot info @ 2010-07-10 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from bugtrack at roumenpetrov dot info 2010-07-10 08:57 -------
*** Bug 42311 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
bugtrack at roumenpetrov dot info changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bugtrack at roumenpetrov dot
| |info
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc
2009-07-27 3:54 [Bug libgcj/40868] New: ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc dsdsdds at 126 dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2010-07-10 8:57 ` bugtrack at roumenpetrov dot info
@ 2010-08-27 4:28 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-27 4:30 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-27 4:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 04:27 -------
Subject: Bug 40868
Author: rwild
Date: Fri Aug 27 04:27:40 2010
New Revision: 163580
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163580
Log:
Fix building ecjx in cross compile mode.
libjava/:
PR libgcj/40868
* configure.ac: Add GCC_FOR_ECJX variable. Ensure
GCJ_FOR_ECJX is always set.
* Makefile.am [!NATIVE] (ecjx.$(OBJEXT)): New rule.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* configure: Regenerate.
* gcj/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* include/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
* testsuite/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
Modified:
trunk/libjava/ChangeLog
trunk/libjava/Makefile.am
trunk/libjava/Makefile.in
trunk/libjava/configure
trunk/libjava/configure.ac
trunk/libjava/gcj/Makefile.in
trunk/libjava/include/Makefile.in
trunk/libjava/testsuite/Makefile.in
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug libgcj/40868] ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc
2009-07-27 3:54 [Bug libgcj/40868] New: ecjx.cc should be compiled by host gcc dsdsdds at 126 dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2010-08-27 4:28 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-08-27 4:30 ` rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-08-27 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 04:30 -------
Fixed.
--
rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread