public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/40873] New: -fwhole-file -fwhole-program: Wrong decls cause too much to be optimized away
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 13:57:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-40873-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
The option -fwhole-programs marks all functions in that file as local to that
file, which facilitates inlining and dead-code elimination.
That of cause assumes that all declarations are properly unified, which should
be the case with -fwhole-file. However, the following Polyhedron testcases fail
ac, aermod, doduc, gas_dyn, linpk, mdbx, rnflow and test_fpu
at link time as too many functions have been elimated:
$ gfortran -fwhole-program -O1 linpk.f90
/tmp/ccWhxrXN.o: In function `MAIN__':
linpk.f90:(.text+0x759): undefined reference to `daxpy_'
linpk.f90:(.text+0x7c7): undefined reference to `daxpy_'
--
Summary: -fwhole-file -fwhole-program: Wrong decls cause too much
to be optimized away
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40873
next reply other threads:[~2009-07-27 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-27 13:57 burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message]
2009-07-27 14:47 ` [Bug fortran/40873] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-28 13:12 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-22 15:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-22 15:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-15 19:54 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-05-16 10:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-16 11:01 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-05-16 11:04 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2010-05-16 11:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-05-16 11:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2010-05-20 13:51 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-24 12:32 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-26 14:28 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-26 14:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-05-26 14:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-09 22:10 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-24 18:15 ` jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
2010-07-24 19:13 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-24 20:16 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-24 22:05 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-25 10:03 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-07-25 10:14 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-26 13:25 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-26 17:02 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-07-26 17:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-26 21:00 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2010-07-27 8:44 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-27 8:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-40873-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).