public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/41022]  New: [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers
@ 2009-08-10 10:11 reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
  2009-08-10 10:12 ` [Bug fortran/41022] " reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
                   ` (8 more replies)
  0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de @ 2009-08-10 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

It seems that not a pointer is transferred but a value in the following case.
Here is the tracking info:

gfortran -g fptr_transfer.f90 -o fptr_transfer && ./fptr_transfer
Segmentation fault (core dumped)gdb fptr_transfer core
[...]
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x0000000000400629 in assign_proc_ptr (ptr=0x0, obj1=( 0x40060c <proc> 
)) at fptr_transfer.f90:32
32          ptr => obj1%proc
(gdb) where
#0  0x0000000000400629 in assign_proc_ptr (ptr=0x0, obj1=( 0x40060c <proc> 
)) at fptr_transfer.f90:32
#1  0x0000000000400687 in transfer_proc_ptr (obj2=( 0 ), obj1=( 0x40060c 
<proc> )) at fptr_transfer.f90:26
#2  0x000000000040064c in foo () at fptr_transfer.f90:19
#3  0x00000000004006c2 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7ffff12d2fe4 
'./fptr_transfer\000') at fptr_transfer.f90:19
#4  0x00007f1d9cdf0586 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#5  0x0000000000400549 in _start () at ../sysdeps/x86_64/elf/start.S:113
Current language:  auto; currently fortran
(gdb)

Here is the corresponding code:
subroutine proc ()
end subroutine proc

program foo

   interface
      subroutine proc ()
      end subroutine proc
   end interface

   type :: container_t
      procedure(proc), nopass, pointer :: proc => null ()
   end type container_t

   type(container_t), target :: obj1
   type(container_t) :: obj2

   obj1%proc => proc
   call transfer_proc_ptr (obj2, obj1)

contains

   subroutine transfer_proc_ptr (obj2, obj1)
     type(container_t), intent(out) :: obj2
     type(container_t), intent(in), target :: obj1
     call assign_proc_ptr (obj2%proc, obj1)
   end subroutine transfer_proc_ptr

   subroutine assign_proc_ptr (ptr, obj1)
     procedure(proc), pointer :: ptr
     type(container_t), intent(in), target :: obj1
     ptr => obj1%proc
   end subroutine assign_proc_ptr

end program foo


-- 
           Summary: [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
 GCC build triplet: Ref. svn r150253
  GCC host triplet: Linux 32bit, 64bit, MAC OS X
GCC target triplet: fortran 4.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41022


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41022] [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers
  2009-08-10 10:11 [Bug fortran/41022] New: [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
@ 2009-08-10 10:12 ` reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
  2009-08-10 12:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de @ 2009-08-10 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de  2009-08-10 10:12 -------
Created an attachment (id=18335)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18335&action=view)
Example file which shows the PP problem


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41022


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41022] [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers
  2009-08-10 10:11 [Bug fortran/41022] New: [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
  2009-08-10 10:12 ` [Bug fortran/41022] " reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
@ 2009-08-10 12:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-08-10 13:41 ` [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] " janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-10 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-10 12:46 -------
Confirmed. -fdump-tree-original shows:

assign_proc_ptr (void (*<T63>) (void) * ptr, struct container_t & obj1)
{
  *ptr = obj1->proc;
}


-- 

janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-08-10 12:46:47
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41022


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] problem with procedure pointers
  2009-08-10 10:11 [Bug fortran/41022] New: [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
  2009-08-10 10:12 ` [Bug fortran/41022] " reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
  2009-08-10 12:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-10 13:41 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-08-10 13:49 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-10 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-10 13:41 -------
Actually the part of the dump shown in comment #2 is ok. The problematic piece
is this:

transfer_proc_ptr (struct container_t & obj2, struct container_t & obj1)
{
  [...]
  assign_proc_ptr (obj2->proc, (struct container_t *) obj1);
}

Here the obj2->proc is missing an "&".


-- 

janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|[4.5.0] problem with        |[F03] problem with procedure
                   |procedure pointers          |pointers


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41022


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] problem with procedure pointers
  2009-08-10 10:11 [Bug fortran/41022] New: [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-08-10 13:41 ` [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] " janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-10 13:49 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-08-10 14:14 ` [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] procedure pointer components as actual arguments janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-10 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-10 13:49 -------
This problems seems to be similar to PR 40450.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41022


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] procedure pointer components as actual arguments
  2009-08-10 10:11 [Bug fortran/41022] New: [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-08-10 13:49 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-10 14:14 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-08-11 20:09 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-10 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-10 14:14 -------
This patchlet should fix it:

Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c    (revision 150621)
+++ gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c    (working copy)
@@ -2679,7 +2679,8 @@ gfc_conv_procedure_call (gfc_se * se, gf
                           && fsym->attr.flavor != FL_PROCEDURE)
                          || (fsym->attr.proc_pointer
                              && !(e->expr_type == EXPR_VARIABLE
-                             && e->symtree->n.sym->attr.dummy))))
+                             && e->symtree->n.sym->attr.dummy))
+                         || gfc_is_proc_ptr_comp (e, NULL)))
                    {
                      /* Scalar pointer dummy args require an extra level of
                         indirection. The null pointer already contains


-- 

janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
            Summary|[F03] problem with procedure|[F03] procedure pointer
                   |pointers                    |components as actual
                   |                            |arguments


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41022


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] procedure pointer components as actual arguments
  2009-08-10 10:11 [Bug fortran/41022] New: [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-08-10 14:14 ` [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] procedure pointer components as actual arguments janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-11 20:09 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-08-11 20:15 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-11 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-11 20:08 -------
Subject: Bug 41022

Author: janus
Date: Tue Aug 11 20:08:35 2009
New Revision: 150665

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=150665
Log:
2009-08-11  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/41022
        * trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_procedure_call): Handle procedure pointer
        components as actual arguments.

2009-08-11  Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/41022
        * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_14.f90: New.


Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_comp_14.f90
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41022


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] procedure pointer components as actual arguments
  2009-08-10 10:11 [Bug fortran/41022] New: [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-08-11 20:09 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-11 20:15 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-08-12 19:10 ` reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
  2009-08-12 19:22 ` reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: janus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-11 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-11 20:15 -------
Fixed with r150665. Thanks for the report.


-- 

janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41022


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] procedure pointer components as actual arguments
  2009-08-10 10:11 [Bug fortran/41022] New: [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-08-11 20:15 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-12 19:10 ` reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
  2009-08-12 19:22 ` reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de @ 2009-08-12 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de  2009-08-12 19:09 -------
The fix seems not to work with the test program. 
On Linux 32 bit I get the following when compiling:
/tmp/cciQlmr1.o: In function `MAIN__':
foo.f90:(.text+0x1b): undefined reference to `proc_'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

and on MAC OS X:
Undefined symbols:
  "_proc_", referenced from:
      _proc_$non_lazy_ptr in ccJFt47G.o
ld: symbol(s) not found
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status


-- 

reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41022


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] procedure pointer components as actual arguments
  2009-08-10 10:11 [Bug fortran/41022] New: [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-08-12 19:10 ` reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
@ 2009-08-12 19:22 ` reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
  8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de @ 2009-08-12 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de  2009-08-12 19:21 -------
Sorry, false alarm. Had a truncated test file.


-- 

reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41022


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-12 19:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-10 10:11 [Bug fortran/41022] New: [4.5.0] problem with procedure pointers reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
2009-08-10 10:12 ` [Bug fortran/41022] " reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
2009-08-10 12:46 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-10 13:41 ` [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] " janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-10 13:49 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-10 14:14 ` [Bug fortran/41022] [F03] procedure pointer components as actual arguments janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-11 20:09 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-11 20:15 ` janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-12 19:10 ` reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de
2009-08-12 19:22 ` reuter at physik dot uni-freiburg dot de

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).