From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id DC959385803E; Wed, 18 May 2022 16:38:47 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DC959385803E
From: "boreynol at microsoft dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/41091] Using section attribute in c and c++ function causes
 section type conflict
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 16:38:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: boreynol at microsoft dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-41091-4-K6mI3XzZRw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-41091-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-41091-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 16:38:48 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D41091

Bobby Reynolds <boreynol at microsoft dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |boreynol at microsoft dot =
com

--- Comment #9 from Bobby Reynolds <boreynol at microsoft dot com> ---
My team is also impacted by this issue (also with tracing code, as it turns
out).

FWIW there's a great writeup explaining the issue on Stack Overflow:

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35091862/inline-static-data-causes-a-se=
ction-type-conflict

In this writeup, the author suggests that perhaps -fno-gnu-unique should
additionally cause GCC to _not_ use section grouping for the associated sym=
bol;
in this case GCC would simply emit a weak symbol without grouping, which I
believe would match the (admittedly less robust) behavior of Clang.=