From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-418570-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8007 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2013 12:38:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7981 invoked by uid 48); 27 Mar 2013 12:38:06 -0000
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/41115] Tree-vectorizer: VecCost tuning for X2: Without vectorization 30% faster
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-41115-4-fIaxaokVT5@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-41115-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-41115-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg02011.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41115

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-27 12:38:05 UTC ---
It would be nice to see where we are today with respect to the cost model /
vectorizing / not vectorizing.