public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/41165]  New: -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.
@ 2009-08-25 14:39 burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-08-25 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/41165] " dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-25 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Since PR 25104 and PR 29962, gfortran allows PRODUCT in initialization
expressions (2009-06-07); however, using -std=f95 PRODUCT is still accepted.

Expected: Print an error when using -std=f95.

INTEGER, PARAMETER :: d = 4 ! Number of elements to permute
INTEGER :: I
INTEGER, PARAMETER :: maxnum = PRODUCT((/(i,i=1,d)/))
print *, maxnum
end


-- 
           Summary: -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: diagnostic
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41165


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41165] -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.
  2009-08-25 14:39 [Bug fortran/41165] New: -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-25 17:09 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-08-25 17:38 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-01 11:50 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-25 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-25 17:09 -------
Without checking, I'd expect it's not only PRODUCT, but all of the intrinsics
allowed in init-expr by F2003.

Offhand I'd blame expr.c (check_transformational), in particular:

2151  functions = (gfc_option.allow_std & GFC_STD_F2003)
2152                ? trans_func_f2003 : trans_func_f95;


-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41165


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41165] -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.
  2009-08-25 14:39 [Bug fortran/41165] New: -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-08-25 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/41165] " dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-25 17:38 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-01 11:50 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-25 17:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-08-25 17:37 -------
It turns out, that the PRODUCT is already simplified to EXPR_CONST before is is
checked in expr.c (check_init_expr).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41165


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41165] -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.
  2009-08-25 14:39 [Bug fortran/41165] New: -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-08-25 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/41165] " dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-08-25 17:38 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-01 11:50 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-01 11:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-09-01 11:49 -------
> It turns out, that the PRODUCT is already simplified to EXPR_CONST
> before is is checked in expr.c (check_init_expr).

To be more specific, in resolve.c (resolve_unknown_f) the simplification is
implied via intrinsic.c (gfc_intrinsic_func_interface). The latter returns

    MATCH_YES    if the call corresponds to an intrinsic, simplification
                 is done if possible.


-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-09-01 11:49:55
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41165


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-01 11:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-08-25 14:39 [Bug fortran/41165] New: -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-25 17:09 ` [Bug fortran/41165] " dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-25 17:38 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-01 11:50 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).