public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug debug/41226] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk
@ 2009-09-02 14:09 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-09-02 14:18 ` [Bug debug/41226] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-09-02 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
On Linux/ia32, revision 151313 gave:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr40753.c -O3 -g (internal compiler error)
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr40753.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops (test
for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -Os (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c -O0 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c -O1 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c -O2 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c -O3 -g (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/guality.c -Os (test for excess errors)
Revision 151310 is OK.
--
Summary: [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions
on trunk
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/41226] [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk
2009-09-02 14:09 [Bug debug/41226] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-09-02 14:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-02 14:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-02 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/41226] [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk
2009-09-02 14:09 [Bug debug/41226] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-09-02 14:18 ` [Bug debug/41226] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-02 14:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-02 14:39 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-02 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-02 14:19 -------
Only pr40753.c is a regression, the rest are new tests. And guality tests are
very much expected to FAIL when -fvar-tracking-assignments isn't enabled (to be
enabled in SVN today), or if you don't have very latest gdb.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.5.0 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/41226] [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk
2009-09-02 14:09 [Bug debug/41226] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-09-02 14:18 ` [Bug debug/41226] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-02 14:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-02 14:39 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2009-09-03 5:35 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-04 19:10 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-09-02 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-09-02 14:39 -------
Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many
regressions on trunk
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Only pr40753.c is a regression, the rest are new tests. And guality tests are
> very much expected to FAIL when -fvar-tracking-assignments isn't enabled (to be
> enabled in SVN today), or if you don't have very latest gdb.
There is a difference between expected to fail on execution and expected
to fail to compile. This bug report is reporting that they are failing to
compile, and it's only execution that's XFAILed. What are the "excess
errors" in the log?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/41226] [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk
2009-09-02 14:09 [Bug debug/41226] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-09-02 14:39 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2009-09-03 5:35 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-04 19:10 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-03 5:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-03 05:35 -------
It was revision 151312 that brought the new failures, actually. 151313 turned
the run-time failures into expected failures, but it did nothing to the cast of
pointer to integer of different size that affects x86_32. I'll look into a way
to avoid that warning. Thanks for the report,
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug debug/41226] [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk
2009-09-02 14:09 [Bug debug/41226] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-09-03 5:35 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-04 19:10 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-04 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-04 19:10 -------
This is fixed with revisions 151432 (regression on pr40753.c test) and 151434
(warnings in guality.h).
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41226
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-04 19:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-02 14:09 [Bug debug/41226] New: [4.5 regression] Revision 151313 caused many regressions on trunk hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-09-02 14:18 ` [Bug debug/41226] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-02 14:19 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-02 14:39 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2009-09-03 5:35 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-04 19:10 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).