public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/41336]  New: [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64
@ 2009-09-11 14:36 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-09-11 14:48 ` [Bug bootstrap/41336] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-09-11 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #38992 +++

On RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64, revision 151545 gave

cc1: warnings being treated as errors
../../src-lto/gcc/lto/lto-elf.c: In function 'validate_file':
../../src-lto/gcc/lto/lto-elf.c:453:3: error: implicit declaration of function
'elf_getshdrstrndx'
make[6]: *** [lto/lto-elf.o] Error 1


-- 
           Summary: [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64
           Product: gcc
           Version: lto
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
 BugsThisDependsOn: 38992


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41336


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/41336] [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64
  2009-09-11 14:36 [Bug bootstrap/41336] New: [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-09-11 14:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-11 15:51 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-11 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-09-11 14:48 -------
You need newer libelf.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41336


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/41336] [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64
  2009-09-11 14:36 [Bug bootstrap/41336] New: [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-09-11 14:48 ` [Bug bootstrap/41336] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-11 15:51 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
  2009-09-11 17:29 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: joseph at codesourcery dot com @ 2009-09-11 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com  2009-09-11 15:51 -------
Subject: Re:  [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and
 RHEL5/ia64

On Fri, 11 Sep 2009, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

> You need newer libelf.

This should result in a configure error, not an error at a later stage; it 
should disable LTO if libelf is too old and LTO is not explicitily 
requested, or give an error at configure time if LTO is explicitly 
requested but libelf is too old.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41336


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/41336] [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64
  2009-09-11 14:36 [Bug bootstrap/41336] New: [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-09-11 14:48 ` [Bug bootstrap/41336] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-11 15:51 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
@ 2009-09-11 17:29 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-11 17:30 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-28 16:24 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-11 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-09-11 17:29 -------
needs configure magician...


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41336


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/41336] [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64
  2009-09-11 14:36 [Bug bootstrap/41336] New: [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-09-11 17:29 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-11 17:30 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-09-28 16:24 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-11 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-09-11 17:30 -------
...but bug is real.


-- 

steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-09-11 17:30:05
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41336


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/41336] [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64
  2009-09-11 14:36 [Bug bootstrap/41336] New: [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-09-11 17:30 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-09-28 16:24 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-09-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-09-28 16:24 -------
Should be fixed now.  We now test for libelf features during configuration. 
Please reopen if it still fails.


-- 

dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41336


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-28 16:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-11 14:36 [Bug bootstrap/41336] New: [LTO] Bootstrap failed on RHEL5/ia32 and RHEL5/ia64 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-09-11 14:48 ` [Bug bootstrap/41336] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-11 15:51 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2009-09-11 17:29 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-11 17:30 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-09-28 16:24 ` dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).