From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-294531-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16135 invoked by alias); 20 Sep 2009 18:32:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 16113 invoked by uid 48); 20 Sep 2009 18:32:29 -0000
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:32:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c++/41421]  New: [C++0x] Trivial types should require trivial default constructor.
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-41421-18215@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "cadaker at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg01910.txt.bz2

The C++0x standard draft defines a trivial type as one that has trivial default
construct, copy constructor, copy assignment operator and destructor. g++ from
the current trunk, however, classifies types without default constructor as
trivial, meaning that the following code does not compile:

    #include <type_traits>

    struct Foo {
        Foo(int) {}
    };

    static_assert(!std::is_trivial<Foo>::value,
                  "Not trivial - no (trivial) default constructor.");


This seems like a bug (unless I've misunderstood the draft or missed some
pending change to it).


-- 
           Summary: [C++0x] Trivial types should require trivial default
                    constructor.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: cadaker at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41421