[Bug c/41517] Unexpected behaviour of #pragma in statement context

[Bug c/41517] Unexpected behaviour of #pragma in statement context

[jan.echternach at de dot gbs.com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41517

Jan Echternach <jan.echternach at de dot gbs.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jan.echternach at de dot gbs.com

--- Comment #1 from Jan Echternach <jan.echternach at de dot gbs.com> ---
I can confirm this bug in gcc 4.9 (Debian 4.9.2-10). A different example which
also produces wrong code (should return 0, but returns 1):

//#include <stdio.h>
int main ()
{
    if (0)
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wtype-limits"
    {
        //printf ("bug\n");
        return 1;
    }
    //printf ("ok\n");
    return 0;
}

And an example that fails to compile ("error: ‘else’ without a previous ‘if’"):

void foo (void)
{
    if (0)
#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wtype-limits"
    {}
    else {}
}
>From gcc-bugs-return-499038-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Oct 08 15:37:22 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-499038-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90421 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2015 15:37:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90315 invoked by uid 48); 8 Oct 2015 15:37:17 -0000
From: "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/67794] [6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 15:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67794-4-QuD6ndhVjS@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67794-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67794-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00593.txt.bz2
Content-length: 221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idg794

--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I have proposed a fix on the mailing list:

https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00858.html