public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug lto/41659]  New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr
@ 2009-10-10 16:05 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-10-10 17:02 ` [Bug testsuite/41659] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-10-10 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4
.5/objdir/gcc/  -O0 -fwhopr  -c  -o c_lto_20090914-2_0.o
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/
gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c    (timeout = 300)
/tmp/ccz0bNae.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccz0bNae.s:73: Error: Unknown opcode: `xorl'
/tmp/ccz0bNae.s:74: Error: Invalid operands 
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
/tmp/ccz0bNae.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccz0bNae.s:73: Error: Unknown opcode: `xorl'
/tmp/ccz0bNae.s:74: Error: Invalid operands 

FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o-c_lto_20090914-2_0.o
link -O0 -fwhopr
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o-c_lto_20090914-2_0.o
execute -O0 -fwhopr

Similar fails:

Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/  -O2 -fwhopr  -c  -o c_lto_20090914-2_0.o
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c    (timeout
= 300)
/tmp/ccWU1kZi.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccWU1kZi.s:71: Error: Unknown opcode: `xorl'
/tmp/ccWU1kZi.s:72: Error: Invalid operands 
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
/tmp/ccWU1kZi.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccWU1kZi.s:71: Error: Unknown opcode: `xorl'
/tmp/ccWU1kZi.s:72: Error: Invalid operands 

FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O2 -fwhopr
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o-c_lto_20090914-2_0.o
link -O2 -fwhopr
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o-c_lto_20090914-2_0.o
execute -O2 -fwhopr

Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/  -O0 -flto  -c  -o c_lto_20090914-2_0.o
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c    (timeout
= 300)
/tmp/ccMAB81s.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccMAB81s.s:73: Error: Unknown opcode: `xorl'
/tmp/ccMAB81s.s:74: Error: Invalid operands 
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
/tmp/ccMAB81s.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccMAB81s.s:73: Error: Unknown opcode: `xorl'
/tmp/ccMAB81s.s:74: Error: Invalid operands 

FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -flto

Executing on host: /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/xgcc
-B/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/objdir/gcc/  -O2 -flto  -c  -o c_lto_20090914-2_0.o
/home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.5/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c    (timeout
= 300)
/tmp/ccKIXMHG.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccKIXMHG.s:71: Error: Unknown opcode: `xorl'
/tmp/ccKIXMHG.s:72: Error: Invalid operands 
compiler exited with status 1
output is:
/tmp/ccKIXMHG.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccKIXMHG.s:71: Error: Unknown opcode: `xorl'
/tmp/ccKIXMHG.s:72: Error: Invalid operands 

FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O2 -flto


-- 
           Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o
                    assemble, -O0 -fwhopr
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: lto
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41659


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/41659] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr
  2009-10-10 16:05 [Bug lto/41659] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-10-10 17:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-10-12 16:07 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-10-10 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-10 17:02 -------
Hm.  So

/* { dg-lto-do run { target x86_64-*-* i?86-*-* } } */

doesn't have the desired effect...


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |janis at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org, rguenth at gcc dot gnu
                   |                            |dot org
          Component|lto                         |testsuite


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41659


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/41659] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr
  2009-10-10 16:05 [Bug lto/41659] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-10-10 17:02 ` [Bug testsuite/41659] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-10-12 16:07 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-10-12 17:14 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-01-02 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-10-12 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-12 16:06 -------
It doesn't have the desired or expected effect, just the documented effect. 
>From  the GCC internals manual section 6.4.6 Support for testing link-time
optimizations: "Unlike dg-do, dg-lto-do does not support an optional `target'
or `xfail' list. Use dg-skip-if, dg-xfail-if, or dg-xfail-run-if."

That's rather obscure.  For now I'll make it an error and then later maybe I'll
have time to support target and xfail for dg-lto-do.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41659


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/41659] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr
  2009-10-10 16:05 [Bug lto/41659] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-10-10 17:02 ` [Bug testsuite/41659] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-10-12 16:07 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-10-12 17:14 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-01-02 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: janis at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-10-12 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-12 17:13 -------
Subject: Bug 41659

Author: janis
Date: Mon Oct 12 17:13:41 2009
New Revision: 152671

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152671
Log:
        PR testsuite/41659
        * gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2.c: Use dg-skip-if to skip test.
        * lib/lto.exp (lto-get-options-main): Report error for using "target"
        or "xfail" with dg-lto-dg.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2_0.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/lib/lto.exp


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41659


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug testsuite/41659] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr
  2009-10-10 16:05 [Bug lto/41659] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-10-12 17:14 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-02 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-02 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-01-02 14:23 -------
Fixed as of http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-12/msg02393.html.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41659


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-02 14:24 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-10 16:05 [Bug lto/41659] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090914-2 c_lto_20090914-2_0.o assemble, -O0 -fwhopr danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-10 17:02 ` [Bug testsuite/41659] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-12 16:07 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-12 17:14 ` janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-02 14:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).