[Bug target/41665] New: Typo in addsi_1_zext?

["hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

There are

(define_insn "addsi_1_zext"
  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r,r")
        (zero_extend:DI
          (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "%0,r")
                   (match_operand:SI 2 "general_operand" "g,li"))))
   (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
  "TARGET_64BIT && ix86_binary_operator_ok (PLUS, SImode, operands)"
{
  switch (get_attr_type (insn))
    {
    case TYPE_LEA:
      operands[2] = SET_SRC (XVECEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0, 0));
      return "lea{l}\t{%a2, %k0|%k0, %a2}";

    case TYPE_INCDEC:
      if (operands[2] == const1_rtx)
        return "inc{l}\t%k0";
      else
        {
          gcc_assert (operands[2] == constm1_rtx);
          return "dec{l}\t%k0";
        }

    default:
      /* Make things pretty and `subl $4,%eax' rather than `addl $-4, %eax'.
         Exceptions: -128 encodes smaller than 128, so swap sign and op.  */
      if (CONST_INT_P (operands[2])
          && (INTVAL (operands[2]) == 128
              || (INTVAL (operands[2]) < 0
                  && INTVAL (operands[2]) != -128)))
        {
          operands[2] = GEN_INT (-INTVAL (operands[2]));
          return "sub{l}\t{%2, %k0|%k0, %2}";
        }
      return "add{l}\t{%2, %k0|%k0, %2}";
    }
}

Shouldn't it be

(plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "%0,0")

Am I missing something?


-- 
           Summary: Typo in addsi_1_zext?
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
GCC target triplet: x86_64-*-*


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41665