From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-424495-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29609 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2013 20:56:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29566 invoked by uid 48); 16 Jun 2013 20:56:30 -0000
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/41724] PUREness/ELEMENTAL check missing for ACTUAL/DUMMY conformance
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 20:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-41724-4-6PiiFC6XZR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-41724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-41724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-06/txt/msg00874.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41724

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-06-16
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
The test A is rejected by 4.5 up to trunk. The tests B and C are rejected by
4.6 up to trunk with

pr41724_1.f90:29.13:

   call test(my_dcos)
             1
Error: Interface mismatch in dummy procedure 'fun' at (1): Mismatch in PURE
attribute

except 4.6 which rejects them with

pr41724_1.f90:29.13:

   call test(my_dcos)
             1
Error: Expected a PURE procedure for argument 'fun' at (1)

Is it still an issue?