public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/41724] PUREness/ELEMENTAL check missing for ACTUAL/DUMMY conformance
       [not found] <bug-41724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2013-06-16 20:56 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2013-12-08 21:34 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-16 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41724

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-06-16
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
The test A is rejected by 4.5 up to trunk. The tests B and C are rejected by
4.6 up to trunk with

pr41724_1.f90:29.13:

   call test(my_dcos)
             1
Error: Interface mismatch in dummy procedure 'fun' at (1): Mismatch in PURE
attribute

except 4.6 which rejects them with

pr41724_1.f90:29.13:

   call test(my_dcos)
             1
Error: Expected a PURE procedure for argument 'fun' at (1)

Is it still an issue?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41724] PUREness/ELEMENTAL check missing for ACTUAL/DUMMY conformance
       [not found] <bug-41724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2013-06-16 20:56 ` [Bug fortran/41724] PUREness/ELEMENTAL check missing for ACTUAL/DUMMY conformance dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2013-12-08 21:34 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-12-08 21:36 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-12-09 23:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-12-08 21:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41724

--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Dec  8 21:34:18 2013
New Revision: 205791

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205791&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-08  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>
            Janus Weil  <janus@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR fortran/58099
        PR fortran/58676
        PR fortran/41724
        * resolve.c (gfc_resolve_intrinsic): Set elemental/pure.
        (resolve_fl_procedure): Reject pure dummy procedures/procedure
        pointers.
        (gfc_explicit_interface_required): Don't require a
        match of ELEMENTAL for intrinsics.

2013-12-08  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

        PR fortran/58099
        PR fortran/58676
        PR fortran/41724
        * gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_8.f90: New.
        * gfortran.dg/proc_decl_9.f90: Add ELEMENTAL to make valid.
        * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_11.f90: Ditto.
        * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_8.f90: Ditto.
        * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_32.f90: Update dg-error.
        * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_33.f90: Ditto.
        * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_1.f90: Add abstract interface
        which is not elemental.
        * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_7.f90: Ditto.


Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/elemental_subroutine_8.f90
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_decl_9.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_11.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_32.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_33.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_1.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_7.f90
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_8.f90


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41724] PUREness/ELEMENTAL check missing for ACTUAL/DUMMY conformance
       [not found] <bug-41724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2013-06-16 20:56 ` [Bug fortran/41724] PUREness/ELEMENTAL check missing for ACTUAL/DUMMY conformance dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2013-12-08 21:34 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-12-08 21:36 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  2013-12-09 23:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-12-08 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41724

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Should be fixed FIXED on the 4.9 trunk.

For details, see also the later comments of PR 58099.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41724] PUREness/ELEMENTAL check missing for ACTUAL/DUMMY conformance
       [not found] <bug-41724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2013-12-08 21:36 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-12-09 23:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-12-09 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41724

--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Dec  9 23:17:06 2013
New Revision: 205838

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=205838&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-12-10  Tobias Burnus  <burnus@net-b.de>

        PR fortran/59428
        PR fortran/58099
        PR fortran/58676
        PR fortran/41724
        * gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_4.f90: Fix proc-ptr interface.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_4.f90


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/41724] PUREness/ELEMENTAL check missing for ACTUAL/DUMMY conformance
  2009-10-16  8:26 [Bug fortran/41724] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-10-19 14:31 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-10-19 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-10-19 14:31 -------
Similarly for proc-pointers, cf. PR 41733.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41724


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-09 23:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-41724-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-06-16 20:56 ` [Bug fortran/41724] PUREness/ELEMENTAL check missing for ACTUAL/DUMMY conformance dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-12-08 21:34 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-08 21:36 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-09 23:17 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2009-10-16  8:26 [Bug fortran/41724] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-10-19 14:31 ` [Bug fortran/41724] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).