From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12629 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2012 22:29:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 12280 invoked by uid 48); 18 Nov 2012 22:29:01 -0000 From: "zeratul976 at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/41958] [c++0x] bogus variadic partial ordering code Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 22:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: zeratul976 at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01685.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41958 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Ridge 2012-11-18 22:28:59 UTC --- I filed the same bug for clang, and I was pointed to DR1395 [1]. GCC and clang's behaviour are both in line with the resolution of this DR. I guess this can be closed as invalid then? [1] http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1395