From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7061 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2012 09:14:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 6948 invoked by uid 48); 5 Nov 2012 09:14:00 -0000 From: "kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/41993] [sh] ICE in create_pre_exit, at mode-switching.c:399 Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:14:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00344.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41993 --- Comment #5 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-11-05 09:13:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > In -O0 case, we broke discovery loop too early, so we can't find all return > regs. I would argue, that we should ignore non-relevant pseudos with: You are right. I was wrong about what is going on that case.