public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/42199]  New: A problem with -maltivec
@ 2009-11-27 19:00 galtgendo at o2 dot pl
  2009-11-27 19:12 ` Andrew Pinski
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: galtgendo at o2 dot pl @ 2009-11-27 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

You'll probably mark this bug as invalid,
as it's not my bug and being on x86, I really can't
provide any info.

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293899
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25103

As you may see there, a trivial autoconf test was failing
with -maltivec, but even before upstream made a change
to do that test with g++, instead of gcc, it was working on x86.

That's why I suspect it may be a compiler problem,
that poppler upstream simply masked.


-- 
           Summary: A problem with -maltivec
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: galtgendo at o2 dot pl


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42199


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: [Bug c/42199]  New: A problem with -maltivec
  2009-11-27 19:00 [Bug c/42199] New: A problem with -maltivec galtgendo at o2 dot pl
@ 2009-11-27 19:12 ` Andrew Pinski
  2009-11-27 19:12 ` [Bug c/42199] " pinskia at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2009-11-27 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugzilla; +Cc: gcc-bugs

Can you attach the preprocessed source for the configure test that is  
failing? It looks like the context sensitive keywords is causing the  
header to fail to compile.

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 27, 2009, at 11:00 AM, "galtgendo at o2 dot pl" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org 
 > wrote:

> You'll probably mark this bug as invalid,
> as it's not my bug and being on x86, I really can't
> provide any info.
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293899
> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25103
>
> As you may see there, a trivial autoconf test was failing
> with -maltivec, but even before upstream made a change
> to do that test with g++, instead of gcc, it was working on x86.
>
> That's why I suspect it may be a compiler problem,
> that poppler upstream simply masked.
>
>
> -- 
>           Summary: A problem with -maltivec
>           Product: gcc
>           Version: 4.4.2
>            Status: UNCONFIRMED
>          Severity: normal
>          Priority: P3
>         Component: c
>        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
>        ReportedBy: galtgendo at o2 dot pl
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42199
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/42199] A problem with -maltivec
  2009-11-27 19:00 [Bug c/42199] New: A problem with -maltivec galtgendo at o2 dot pl
  2009-11-27 19:12 ` Andrew Pinski
@ 2009-11-27 19:12 ` pinskia at gmail dot com
  2009-12-01 19:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gmail dot com @ 2009-11-27 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gmail dot com  2009-11-27 19:12 -------
Subject: Re:   New: A problem with -maltivec

Can you attach the preprocessed source for the configure test that is  
failing? It looks like the context sensitive keywords is causing the  
header to fail to compile.

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 27, 2009, at 11:00 AM, "galtgendo at o2 dot pl"
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org 
 > wrote:

> You'll probably mark this bug as invalid,
> as it's not my bug and being on x86, I really can't
> provide any info.
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293899
> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25103
>
> As you may see there, a trivial autoconf test was failing
> with -maltivec, but even before upstream made a change
> to do that test with g++, instead of gcc, it was working on x86.
>
> That's why I suspect it may be a compiler problem,
> that poppler upstream simply masked.
>
>
> -- 
>           Summary: A problem with -maltivec
>           Product: gcc
>           Version: 4.4.2
>            Status: UNCONFIRMED
>          Severity: normal
>          Priority: P3
>         Component: c
>        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
>        ReportedBy: galtgendo at o2 dot pl
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42199
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42199


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/42199] A problem with -maltivec
  2009-11-27 19:00 [Bug c/42199] New: A problem with -maltivec galtgendo at o2 dot pl
  2009-11-27 19:12 ` Andrew Pinski
  2009-11-27 19:12 ` [Bug c/42199] " pinskia at gmail dot com
@ 2009-12-01 19:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-01-03 16:46 ` galtgendo at o2 dot pl
  2010-02-21 21:22 ` galtgendo at o2 dot pl
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-01 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42199


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/42199] A problem with -maltivec
  2009-11-27 19:00 [Bug c/42199] New: A problem with -maltivec galtgendo at o2 dot pl
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-12-01 19:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-01-03 16:46 ` galtgendo at o2 dot pl
  2010-02-21 21:22 ` galtgendo at o2 dot pl
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: galtgendo at o2 dot pl @ 2010-01-03 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl  2010-01-03 16:46 -------
Created an attachment (id=19452)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19452&action=view)
preprocessed sources

Finally I've got a response in the Gentoo bug.
Info:
Using built-in specs.
Target: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.4.2/work/gcc-4.4.2/configure
--prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.4.2
--includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/4.4.2/include
--datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/4.4.2
--mandir=/usr/share/gcc-data/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/4.4.2/man
--infodir=/usr/share/gcc-data/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/4.4.2/info
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/4.4.2/include/g++-v4
--host=powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu --build=powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
--enable-altivec --disable-fixed-point --with-ppl --with-cloog --enable-nls
--without-included-gettext --with-system-zlib --disable-checking
--disable-werror --enable-secureplt --disable-multilib --enable-libmudflap
--disable-libssp --enable-libgomp --enable-cld
--with-python-dir=/share/gcc-data/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/4.4.2/python
--disable-libgcj --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-shared
--enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu
--with-bugurl=http://bugs.gentoo.org/ --with-pkgversion='Gentoo 4.4.2 p1.0'
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.2 (Gentoo 4.4.2 p1.0)

Command line:
 powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc \
 -std=gnu99 -E -Os -mcpu=G4 -mtune=G4 -maltivec -mabi=altivec -Wall \
 conftest.c -o conftest.i


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42199


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/42199] A problem with -maltivec
  2009-11-27 19:00 [Bug c/42199] New: A problem with -maltivec galtgendo at o2 dot pl
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-01-03 16:46 ` galtgendo at o2 dot pl
@ 2010-02-21 21:22 ` galtgendo at o2 dot pl
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: galtgendo at o2 dot pl @ 2010-02-21 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from galtgendo at o2 dot pl  2010-02-21 21:22 -------
There's new input in a different Gentoo bug:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=305333

Apparently in certain conditions on ppc, 
bool is both defined and undefined.

Unless you'll see that as bad code on openjpeg side.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42199


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-21 21:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-27 19:00 [Bug c/42199] New: A problem with -maltivec galtgendo at o2 dot pl
2009-11-27 19:12 ` Andrew Pinski
2009-11-27 19:12 ` [Bug c/42199] " pinskia at gmail dot com
2009-12-01 19:40 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-01-03 16:46 ` galtgendo at o2 dot pl
2010-02-21 21:22 ` galtgendo at o2 dot pl

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).