public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/42202]  New: [4.5 regression] many gfortran failures
@ 2009-11-28  0:03 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-11-28  0:47 ` [Bug middle-end/42202] [4.5 regression] Revision 154688 caused " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-11-28  0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

On Linux/ia64, revision 154697 gave

FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_10.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_10.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_2.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/alloc_comp_assign_2.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_11.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/bound_6.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/bound_6.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/forall_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_pack_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_pack_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_pack_3.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/intrinsic_pack_3.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
 execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/optional_dim_2.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/optional_dim_2.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/optional_dim_3.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/optional_dim_3.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pack_mask_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/pack_mask_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_2.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/ret_pointer_2.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_2.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_2.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/where_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/where_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/widechar_intrinsics_4.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/widechar_intrinsics_4.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/widechar_intrinsics_5.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/widechar_intrinsics_5.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-loops  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/zero_sized_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/zero_sized_1.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/reduction6.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loops -finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/reduction6.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test

Revision 154678 is OK.


-- 
           Summary: [4.5 regression] many gfortran failures
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
GCC target triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42202


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/42202] [4.5 regression] Revision 154688 caused many gfortran failures
  2009-11-28  0:03 [Bug middle-end/42202] New: [4.5 regression] many gfortran failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-11-28  0:47 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-11-28  2:06 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-11-28  0:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-11-28 00:47 -------
It is caused by revision 154688:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2009-11/msg00911.html


-- 

hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |bernds at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
            Summary|[4.5 regression] many       |[4.5 regression] Revision
                   |gfortran failures           |154688 caused many gfortran
                   |                            |failures


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42202


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/42202] [4.5 regression] Revision 154688 caused many gfortran failures
  2009-11-28  0:03 [Bug middle-end/42202] New: [4.5 regression] many gfortran failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-11-28  0:47 ` [Bug middle-end/42202] [4.5 regression] Revision 154688 caused " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-11-28  2:06 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
  2009-11-28 15:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu @ 2009-11-28  2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2009-11-28 02:06 -------
No new failures seen on x86_64-apple-darwin10 at r154715 in the gfortran
testsuite at -m64.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42202


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/42202] [4.5 regression] Revision 154688 caused many gfortran failures
  2009-11-28  0:03 [Bug middle-end/42202] New: [4.5 regression] many gfortran failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-11-28  0:47 ` [Bug middle-end/42202] [4.5 regression] Revision 154688 caused " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-11-28  2:06 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
@ 2009-11-28 15:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-12-02 12:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-11-28 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42202


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/42202] [4.5 regression] Revision 154688 caused many gfortran failures
  2009-11-28  0:03 [Bug middle-end/42202] New: [4.5 regression] many gfortran failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-11-28 15:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-02 12:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-12-03 12:59 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-12-04 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-02 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
           Priority|P3                          |P1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42202


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/42202] [4.5 regression] Revision 154688 caused many gfortran failures
  2009-11-28  0:03 [Bug middle-end/42202] New: [4.5 regression] many gfortran failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-12-02 12:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-03 12:59 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-12-04 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-03 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-03 12:58 -------
Subject: Bug 42202

Author: bernds
Date: Thu Dec  3 12:58:30 2009
New Revision: 154944

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154944
Log:
        PR middle-end/42202
        * regrename.c (live_in_chains): New variable.
        (verify_reg_tracked): New static function.
        (scan_rtx_reg): Update live_in_chains.
        (scan_rtx): Only promote sets in COND_EXEC to OP_INOUT if
        we're already tracking the reg.
        (build_def_use): Likewise.  Initialize live_in_chains.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/regrename.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42202


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/42202] [4.5 regression] Revision 154688 caused many gfortran failures
  2009-11-28  0:03 [Bug middle-end/42202] New: [4.5 regression] many gfortran failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-12-03 12:59 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-04 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-04 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-04 14:24 -------
Fixed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42202


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-04 14:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-28  0:03 [Bug middle-end/42202] New: [4.5 regression] many gfortran failures hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-11-28  0:47 ` [Bug middle-end/42202] [4.5 regression] Revision 154688 caused " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-11-28  2:06 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-11-28 15:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-02 12:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-03 12:59 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-04 14:25 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).