public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/42465] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2001
[not found] <bug-42465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2014-04-26 0:39 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-26 0:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-26 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42465
David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2014-04-26
CC| |dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Apparently confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/42465] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2001
[not found] <bug-42465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-04-26 0:39 ` [Bug target/42465] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2001 dje at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-04-26 0:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: dje at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-26 0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42465
David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn <dje at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I do not know when this was fixed, but all of the recent versions that I can
test do not exhibit the failure. GCC 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/42465] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2001
2009-12-22 17:09 [Bug c++/42465] New: " gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-30 15:39 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
@ 2009-12-30 15:41 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net @ 2009-12-30 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net 2009-12-30 15:41 -------
I've narrowed it down to this invocation:
g++ -o octonion_test.o -c -mxl-compat ld_break.cpp
So it's caused by some interaction with -mxl-compat
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42465
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/42465] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2001
2009-12-22 17:09 [Bug c++/42465] New: " gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-30 15:24 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
@ 2009-12-30 15:39 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
2009-12-30 15:41 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net @ 2009-12-30 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net 2009-12-30 15:39 -------
Aha, found a small test case:
int main()
{
long double d;
bool b = static_cast<long double>(0) == d;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42465
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/42465] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2001
2009-12-22 17:09 [Bug c++/42465] New: " gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-22 19:53 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
@ 2009-12-30 15:24 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
2009-12-30 15:39 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
2009-12-30 15:41 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net @ 2009-12-30 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net 2009-12-30 15:24 -------
Ok, I ran the delta program for a few days and got this message:
Died at /home/s.somani/thirdparty/delta-2006.08.03/delta line 123, <> line
64641
Doh!
I'll try and see if I can get another test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42465
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/42465] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2001
2009-12-22 17:09 [Bug c++/42465] New: " gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
2009-12-22 18:16 ` [Bug target/42465] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-22 18:22 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
@ 2009-12-22 19:53 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
2009-12-30 15:24 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net @ 2009-12-22 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net 2009-12-22 19:52 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> It would be nice if could provide a manageable reproducer. Did you try delta
> already?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction
>
> Thanks in advance.
Do you know how long it is expected to take? It's been running since you
suggested it. I just want to know if it is guaranteed to finish at some point.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42465
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/42465] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2001
2009-12-22 17:09 [Bug c++/42465] New: " gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
2009-12-22 18:16 ` [Bug target/42465] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-12-22 18:22 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
2009-12-22 19:53 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net @ 2009-12-22 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net 2009-12-22 18:22 -------
U(In reply to comment #4)
> Also you might want to try 4.4.2 which has fixed some TOC related ICEs.
>
Unfortunately, I am stuck with this version but I will try that to find out if
it does fix the issue to make a case for upgrading.
It seems to be related to the use of long double. Does that make any sense?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42465
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/42465] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2001
2009-12-22 17:09 [Bug c++/42465] New: " gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
@ 2009-12-22 18:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-22 18:22 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-12-22 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-22 18:16 -------
Also you might want to try 4.4.2 which has fixed some TOC related ICEs.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Severity|blocker |normal
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
GCC build triplet|powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.2.0 |
GCC host triplet|powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.2.0 |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42465
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-26 0:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-42465-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2014-04-26 0:39 ` [Bug target/42465] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2001 dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-26 0:42 ` dje at gcc dot gnu.org
2009-12-22 17:09 [Bug c++/42465] New: " gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
2009-12-22 18:16 ` [Bug target/42465] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-22 18:22 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
2009-12-22 19:53 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
2009-12-30 15:24 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
2009-12-30 15:39 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
2009-12-30 15:41 ` gccbugzilla at taggedtype dot net
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).