[Bug driver/42485] New: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken

[Bug driver/42485] New: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken

[arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com]

Starting at GCC 4.4.0, the -V switch doesn't work:

$ gcc-4.1 -V4.3 -dumpversion
4.3.4
$ gcc-4.4 -V4.3 -dumpversion
$


-- 
           Summary: [4.4 regression] -V switch broken
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: driver
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: arthur dot loiret at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485

[Bug driver/42485] [4.4 regression] -V switch broken

[debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org]

------- Comment #1 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org  2009-12-29 23:54 -------
wouldn't it be better to deprecate the -V switch altogether?

  Matthias


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485

[Bug driver/42485] [4.4 regression] -V switch broken

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-30 00:03 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> wouldn't it be better to deprecate the -V switch altogether?

Well it works on the trunk ...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485

[Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -V switch broken

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-30 00:07 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > wouldn't it be better to deprecate the -V switch altogether?
> 
> Well it works on the trunk ...

I am wrong.  And it is useful thing for GCC developers really.

Confirmed.

In fact it worked with "gcc version 4.4.0 20081229 (experimental) [trunk
revision 142951] (GCC) "


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
      Known to fail|                            |4.4.0 4.5.0
      Known to work|                            |4.3.0
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-12-30 00:07:53
               date|                            |
            Summary|[4.4 regression] -V switch  |[4.4/4.5 Regression] -V
                   |broken                      |switch broken
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.4.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485

[Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -V switch broken

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-12-31 15:41 -------
I'm fine with deprecating -V - anyone care to send a patch?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485

[Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -V switch broken

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485

[Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -V switch broken

[jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.4.3                       |4.4.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485

[Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -V switch broken

[manu at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-22 09:02 -------
Testing a patch to deprecated -b and -V.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485

[Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5 Regression] -V switch broken

[manu at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-23 10:44 -------
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00915.html


-- 

manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                URL|                            |http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
                   |                            |patches/2010-
                   |                            |02/msg00915.html
           Keywords|                            |patch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485

[Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -V switch broken

[manu at gcc dot gnu dot org]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 743 bytes --]



------- Comment #7 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-08 17:21 -------
Subject: Bug 42485

Author: manu
Date: Thu Apr  8 17:21:26 2010
New Revision: 158134

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158134
Log:
2010-04-08  Manuel López-Ibáñez  <manu@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR 42485
        * doc/invoke.texi (-b,-V): Delete.
        * doc/tm.texi: Do not mention -b.
        * gcc.c (display_help): Delete -b and -V.
        (process_command): Delete -b and -V.
        * gcc.h (DEFAULT_SWITCH_TAKES_ARG): Delete -b and -V.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
    trunk/gcc/doc/tm.texi
    trunk/gcc/gcc.c
    trunk/gcc/gcc.h


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485

[Bug driver/42485] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] -V switch broken

[manu at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #8 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-08 17:24 -------
No more switch -V, so FIXED. (or WONTFIX as you prefer). Use gcc-VERSION
directly, which should work every where.


-- 

manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42485