From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32567 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2010 16:35:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 32437 invoked by uid 48); 12 Jan 2010 16:35:00 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:35:00 -0000 Subject: [Bug libstdc++/42712] New: search_n/iterator.cc times out in parallel-mode X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Message-ID: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg01389.txt.bz2 I'm consistently seeing this time out when regtesting make check-parallel. Is it unavoidable withing the current infrastructure? Besides slowing down the testing itself (not a very big issue, momentarily, I will commit an hack for this), seems a quite puzzling behavior to me: if parallel-mode runs orders of magnitude slower than serial-mode, shouldn't in principle at minimum fall back to the latter? -- Summary: search_n/iterator.cc times out in parallel-mode Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42712