From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-344978-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27726 invoked by alias); 27 Jan 2011 02:28:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 27714 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jan 2011 02:28:01 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 02:27:58 +0000
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/42893] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missed conditionally dead store elimination
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status CC Resolution Target Milestone
Message-ID: <bug-42893-4-gYzAuy1hD6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-42893-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-42893-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:39:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg02917.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42893

Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |law at redhat dot com
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|4.3.6                       |4.6.0

--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> 2011-01-27 02:27:36 UTC ---
DSE1 removes tui_refreshing_registers = 1 as it's a dead store.

DOM2 then removes tui_refreshing_registers = 0 because it's able to prove the
memory location already holds the value 0.

That ultimately leaves an empty function as we leave the tree-ssa optimizers,
which is precisely what we want.