public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems @ 2010-01-29 20:11 ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-29 22:35 ` [Bug fortran/42900] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (5 more replies) 0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-29 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs I've noticed that all the gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 fail for me on all platforms (i.e. sparc-sun-solaris2, alpha-dec-osf, mips-sgi-irix). FAIL: gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90 -O0 execution test at all optimization levels. Running it under gdb reveals that it aborts here: #4 0x000110f0 in MAIN__ () at /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/solaris/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90:19 19 if (s1(6) /= getgid() .and. getgid() /= 0) call abort Unfortunately, the test is bogus: at least on NFS with either the sgid bit set on the parent directory or with the filesystem mounted with the grpid option, newly created files are created with the gid of the directory, not the primary group of the owner. I don't know how best to fix this (maybe check if the file's group is in the set of supplemental groups, if libgfortran supports getgroups). -- Summary: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems 2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-29 22:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-01 9:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-01-29 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-29 22:35 ------- I'd say add a comment to the testcase and WONTFIX. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems 2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-29 22:35 ` [Bug fortran/42900] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-01 9:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-03-01 12:26 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-02-01 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-02-01 09:21 ------- Subject: Re: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems > ------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-29 22:35 ------- > I'd say add a comment to the testcase and WONTFIX. I don't think this is a good idea: this part of the testcase tests a condition that doesn't necessarily hold, and is outside the control of the testsuite. I'd rather remove that part of the test than have this confusing noise in many reports. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems 2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-29 22:35 ` [Bug fortran/42900] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-01 9:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-03-01 12:26 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-01 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 12:25 ------- Subject: Bug 42900 Author: ro Date: Mon Mar 1 12:25:34 2010 New Revision: 157135 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157135 Log: PR fortran/42900 * gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90: Accept 'testfile' gid == parent dir gid. Explain this. * gfortran.dg/stat_2.f90: Likewise. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90 trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stat_2.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems 2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2010-03-01 12:26 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 16:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-01 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #5 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 18:19 ------- Fixed for 4.5.0: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00992.html -- ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems 2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 16:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-01 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 18:19 ------- Mine. -- ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ro at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-03-01 18:19:00 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42900] gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems 2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-02 16:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-02 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #6 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 16:35 ------- Subject: Bug 42900 Author: ro Date: Wed Jun 2 16:35:15 2010 New Revision: 160161 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=160161 Log: Backport from mainline: 2010-03-01 Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> PR fortran/42900 * gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90: Accept 'testfile' gid == parent dir gid. Explain this. * gfortran.dg/stat_2.f90: Likewise. Modified: branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stat_1.f90 branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/stat_2.f90 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42900 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-02 16:35 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-01-29 20:11 [Bug fortran/42900] New: gfortran.dg/stat_[12].f90 may fail on NFS filesystems ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-29 22:35 ` [Bug fortran/42900] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-01 9:21 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-03-01 12:26 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 18:19 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-02 16:35 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).