public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check
[not found] <bug-42934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-01-24 12:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-16 17:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-16 17:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-01-24 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-01-24 11:41:21 UTC ---
> The following example shows this: For LOC(f) it prints the address of the
> function, for LOC(f()) the result of the function call; but it fails for
This is the case for gfortran 4.4 and 4.5, but 4.6 and trunk gives the
following error
pr42934.f90:14.13:
print *, loc(f()) ! print 0
1
Error: 'x' argument of 'loc' intrinsic at (1) must be a variable
What result do you expect? Is it a 4.6/4.7 regression?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check
[not found] <bug-42934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-24 12:39 ` [Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2013-06-16 17:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-16 17:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-16 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2013-06-16
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> What result do you expect? Is it a 4.6/4.7 regression?
Ping!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check
[not found] <bug-42934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-24 12:39 ` [Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-16 17:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2013-06-16 17:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-16 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
No answer since over a year and the code in comment #0 seems to be gone.
Finally closing as fixed. Please reopen if I am missing something.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-16 17:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-42934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-24 12:39 ` [Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-16 17:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-16 17:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).