public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check [not found] <bug-42934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2012-01-24 12:39 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-06-16 17:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-06-16 17:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2012-01-24 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> 2012-01-24 11:41:21 UTC --- > The following example shows this: For LOC(f) it prints the address of the > function, for LOC(f()) the result of the function call; but it fails for This is the case for gfortran 4.4 and 4.5, but 4.6 and trunk gives the following error pr42934.f90:14.13: print *, loc(f()) ! print 0 1 Error: 'x' argument of 'loc' intrinsic at (1) must be a variable What result do you expect? Is it a 4.6/4.7 regression? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check [not found] <bug-42934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2012-01-24 12:39 ` [Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-16 17:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-06-16 17:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-16 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934 Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed| |2013-06-16 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- > What result do you expect? Is it a 4.6/4.7 regression? Ping! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check [not found] <bug-42934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2012-01-24 12:39 ` [Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-06-16 17:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-16 17:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-16 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42934 Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> --- No answer since over a year and the code in comment #0 seems to be gone. Finally closing as fixed. Please reopen if I am missing something. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-16 17:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-42934-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-01-24 12:39 ` [Bug fortran/42934] Bogus variable_check dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-16 17:35 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-06-16 17:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).