public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 Regression] Redundant switch labels not cleaned up anymore
[not found] <bug-42963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-02-25 23:58 ` steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-16 19:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-25 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42963
Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work| |
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-25 23:17:00 UTC ---
Will not be fixed for GCC 4.5. No need to keep this open.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 Regression] Redundant switch labels not cleaned up anymore
[not found] <bug-42963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-02-25 23:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 Regression] Redundant switch labels not cleaned up anymore steven at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-16 19:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-16 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42963
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-16 19:09:24 UTC ---
.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 Regression] Redundant switch labels not cleaned up anymore
2010-02-04 23:22 [Bug tree-optimization/42963] New: [4,5 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-06 11:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-14 14:53 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: matz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-14 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-14 14:53 -------
Fixed for 4.6. I propose to WONTFIX this for 4.5.
--
matz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|matz at gcc dot gnu dot org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
| |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Known to work|4.4.3 |4.4.3 4.6.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression] |[4.5 Regression] Redundant
|Redundant switch labels not |switch labels not cleaned up
|cleaned up anymore |anymore
Target Milestone|4.5.1 |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42963
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 Regression] Redundant switch labels not cleaned up anymore
2010-02-04 23:22 [Bug tree-optimization/42963] New: [4,5 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-04-01 13:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-06 11:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-14 14:53 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-06 11:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 11:20 -------
GCC 4.5.0 is being released. Deferring to 4.5.1.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.5.0 |4.5.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42963
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 Regression] Redundant switch labels not cleaned up anymore
2010-02-04 23:22 [Bug tree-optimization/42963] New: [4,5 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-05 10:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-19 16:55 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-01 13:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-06 11:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-14 14:53 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: steven at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-01 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-01 13:51 -------
How is the polishing going?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42963
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 Regression] Redundant switch labels not cleaned up anymore
2010-02-04 23:22 [Bug tree-optimization/42963] New: [4,5 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-05 10:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-19 16:55 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-01 13:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: matz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-19 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-19 16:55 -------
Actually I have a patch for this, need to polish it somewhat.
--
matz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-02-05 10:15:46 |2010-03-19 16:55:07
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42963
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 Regression] Redundant switch labels not cleaned up anymore
2010-02-04 23:22 [Bug tree-optimization/42963] New: [4,5 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-02-05 10:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-19 16:55 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-02-05 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-05 10:15 -------
This optimization was triggered by the useless path which simplified some
jumps before CFG building which did the switch label merging.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to work| |4.4.3
Priority|P3 |P2
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-02-05 10:15:46
date| |
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42963
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-01-16 19:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-42963-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-02-25 23:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 Regression] Redundant switch labels not cleaned up anymore steven at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-16 19:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-02-04 23:22 [Bug tree-optimization/42963] New: [4,5 " steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-02-05 10:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/42963] [4.5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-19 16:55 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-01 13:51 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-06 11:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-14 14:53 ` matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).