From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-337832-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28380 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2010 15:17:36 -0000
Received: (qmail 28354 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Nov 2010 15:17:35 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:17:31 +0000
From: "d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/43218] [LTO] Conflicting function types cause ICE
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, lto
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-43218-4-i0UujBNGth@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-43218-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-43218-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:27:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg02565.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43218

Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |

--- Comment #4 from Dmitry Gorbachev <d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com> 2010-11-20 15:17:28 UTC ---
Testcases #2 and #3 still fail with GCC 4.6.0 20101113. Testcase #1 fails with
GCC 4.5.2.