From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2579 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2010 19:06:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 2540 invoked by uid 48); 9 Mar 2010 19:06:39 -0000 Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:06:00 -0000 Subject: [Bug target/43311] New: missed 'movw' optimization. X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Message-ID: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pluto at agmk dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00843.txt.bz2 reduced testcase: typedef struct { unsigned char b1, b2; } __attribute__((aligned(8))) S; void f( S const* s, unsigned char* b1, unsigned char* b2 ) { *b1 = s->b1; *b2 = s->b2; } generates at -Os and -O3: f: movb (%rdi), %al # .b1, .b1 movb %al, (%rsi) # .b1,* b1 movb 1(%rdi), %al # .b2, .b2 movb %al, (%rdx) # .b2,* b2 ret gcc could (at least at -Os) reduce code size and memory accesses to: movw (%rdi), %ax movb %al, (%rsi) # .b1,* b1 movb %ah, (%rdx) # .b2,* b2 ret -- Summary: missed 'movw' optimization. Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43311