public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/43494] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Overlooked dependency causes wrong scheduling, wrong code
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:56:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-43494-4-UFYw8VCjud@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-43494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43494
--- Comment #29 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-01-13 10:55:01 UTC ---
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43494
>
> --- Comment #28 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-13 10:31:21 UTC ---
> Created attachment 22957
> --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22957
> Updated patch, still awaiting review
>
> The patch to fix this bug, posted on Sept 21, is still awaiting review :-(
>
> This updated version fixes just a whitespace difference that caused it to fail
> to apply.
I suppose pinging it on the ML is better than pinging it here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-13 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-43494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-10-01 12:03 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-13 10:51 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-13 10:56 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2011-01-27 11:10 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-03 6:05 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-03 6:08 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 22:52 ` sje at cup dot hp.com
2011-02-09 22:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-09 23:44 ` sje at cup dot hp.com
2011-02-10 7:03 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-03-23 17:34 [Bug c/43494] New: gcc.c-torture/execute/vector-2.c fails with -fpic/-fPIC ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-20 18:08 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/43494] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Overlooked dependency causes wrong scheduling, wrong code steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21 8:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21 8:22 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21 8:32 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21 9:28 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21 9:33 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21 9:49 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-21 10:07 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-07-22 8:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-17 13:14 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-18 10:50 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-18 14:36 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-18 19:00 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-08-19 13:39 ` bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-10 23:16 ` aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-43494-4-UFYw8VCjud@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).