From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-343301-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10673 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2011 10:55:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 10663 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2011 10:55:28 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:55:24 +0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/43494] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Overlooked dependency causes wrong scheduling, wrong code
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: alias, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.4.6
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-43494-4-UFYw8VCjud@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-43494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-43494-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 10:56:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg01240.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43494

--- Comment #29 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-01-13 10:55:01 UTC ---
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43494
> 
> --- Comment #28 from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-13 10:31:21 UTC ---
> Created attachment 22957
>   --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22957
> Updated patch, still awaiting review
> 
> The patch to fix this bug, posted on Sept 21, is still awaiting review :-(
> 
> This updated version fixes just a whitespace difference that caused it to fail
> to apply.

I suppose pinging it on the ML is better than pinging it here.