From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28775 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2014 17:06:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28728 invoked by uid 48); 22 Apr 2014 17:06:05 -0000 From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for __float128 Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 17:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg01610.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 Marc Glisse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > I guess #c4 patch will break ppc/s390 etc. > config/os/gnu-linux/ldbl-extra.ver already has: > CXXABI_LDBL_1.3 { > _ZT[IS]g; > _ZT[IS]Pg; > _ZT[IS]PKg; > }; > > So, IMNSHO you don't want to add something like that to gnu.ver, but have > a special *.ver file for those 3 targets (i?86/x86_64/ia64) that have > __float128. Er, oups, I was going to close the bug, but apparently I overlooked this comment when writing the patch, sorry :-( Should I revert right away? It looks like I need to create a file config/?/?/float128.ver and find the right incantation in configure to add it to port_specific_symbol_files for those 3 targets?