public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "john at johnmaddock dot co.uk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for __float128
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 12:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-43622-4-hSi8wQNKGa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-43622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622
--- Comment #26 from John Maddock <john at johnmaddock dot co.uk> ---
(In reply to joseph@codesourcery.com from comment #25)
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, john at johnmaddock dot co.uk wrote:
>
> > While we're opening cans of worms.... intmax_t should clearly be __int128...
> > just saying!
>
> Existing ABIs where intmax_t in libc is 64-bit are why __int128 is what I
> call a sui generis extended type, not an integer type.
So it's an integer that's not an integer? I'm sorry but that's just nonesense.
Of course I realise that ABI issues may trump other concerns, but please call
a spade a spade! In any case this is a glibc issue and we're off topic here...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-21 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-43622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-02-24 8:25 ` [Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for __float128 and __int128 bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-24 16:04 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-02-24 18:59 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-24 19:06 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-24 19:28 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-24 19:42 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-24 20:14 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-25 19:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-14 15:56 ` planet36 at gmail dot com
2011-04-28 16:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-25 15:06 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2012-10-21 22:06 ` planet36 at gmail dot com
2014-03-02 10:41 ` pbristow at hetp dot u-net.com
2014-03-02 12:15 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-02 16:11 ` [Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for __float128 glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-22 16:45 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-22 17:06 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-22 17:25 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-22 17:55 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-18 20:21 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-18 20:42 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-11-18 23:50 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-11-20 17:12 ` john at johnmaddock dot co.uk
2014-11-21 12:18 ` john at johnmaddock dot co.uk [this message]
2015-04-04 13:36 ` [Bug libstdc++/43622] Incomplete C++ library support " glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-04 12:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-16 18:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-16 18:47 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-16 18:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-16 19:33 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2023-05-16 19:43 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-43622-4-hSi8wQNKGa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).