From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19516 invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2011 18:53:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 19504 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Feb 2011 18:53:15 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:53:12 +0000 From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for __float128 and __int128 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:59:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg02792.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 --- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-02-24 18:53:08 UTC --- Expecting this as exported as fundamental_type_info, see in emit_support_tinfos via rtti.c:1461: static tree *const fundamentals[] = { &void_type_node, &boolean_type_node, &wchar_type_node, &char16_type_node, &char32_type_node, &char_type_node, &signed_char_type_node, &unsigned_char_type_node, &short_integer_type_node, &short_unsigned_type_node, &integer_type_node, &unsigned_type_node, &long_integer_type_node, &long_unsigned_type_node, &long_long_integer_type_node, &long_long_unsigned_type_node, &int128_integer_type_node, &int128_unsigned_type_node, &float_type_node, &double_type_node, &long_double_type_node, &dfloat32_type_node, &dfloat64_type_node, &dfloat128_type_node, &nullptr_type_node, 0 }; Which should take care of this, given the libstdc++ ver patch to export the symbols. However, none is emitted when building libsupc++/fundamental_type_info.o. Ouch.