From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2628 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2012 10:17:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 2520 invoked by uid 55); 7 Dec 2012 10:16:49 -0000 From: "stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/43631] var-tracking inserts notes with non-NULL BLOCK_FOR_INSN in between basic blocks Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 10:17:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-debug X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00664.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631 --- Comment #10 from stevenb.gcc at gmail dot com 2012-12-07 10:16:49 UTC --- On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:11 AM, izamyatin at gmail dot com wrote: > Looks like there is some garbage in BLOCK_FOR_INSN field for barrier > instruction... A BARRIER doesn't even have a BLOCK_FOR_INSN. It's not an insn, after all. Where/how do you end up looking at BLOCK_FOR_INSN for a BARRIER?