From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 797BD3858C66; Tue, 1 Aug 2023 08:21:58 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 797BD3858C66 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1690878118; bh=AMFFSSLSCkvmbAeU4jflMAIFQctSAZWE0AZQORxM4WE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BtNFDdEq+La4c7CkhA9sOOl/XVWYa0SRHoxbx+ZoHTcIiXn3xKVdu75ZUVPxNZSOw WNMXu+Yk2b2fTW3BNtYHy65kQW0VQzpARfEbohy4o9yrDL3218xzgGa3PzjawIj0Z6 mHWLEPWH85C9NgSZ+8cvHTaz2rM23AX55fOZtqwA= From: "jbeulich at suse dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/43644] __uint128_t missed optimizations. Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2023 08:21:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeulich at suse dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D43644 jbeulich at suse dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jbeulich at suse dot com --- Comment #4 from jbeulich at suse dot com --- I don't know what's different about my build, but I'm seeing the new pr43644-2.c test failing, with this code generated: foo: movq %rdx, %rcx movq %rdi, %rax movq %rsi, %rdx addq %rcx, %rax adcq $0, %rdx ret=