From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17183 invoked by alias); 29 Jun 2011 13:35:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 17120 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jun 2011 13:35:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:35:14 +0000 From: "siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/43725] Poor instructions selection, scheduling and registers allocation for ARM NEON intrinsics X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:35:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg02838.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725 --- Comment #6 from Siarhei Siamashka 2011-06-29 13:35:13 UTC --- Created attachment 24630 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24630 test.c Attached a slightly updated testcase, which can demonstrate unnecessary spills to stack even with more recent versions of gcc as explained in comment 2 earlier (just slightly increased the number of uses for X() macro)