public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/43735]  New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c
@ 2010-04-12 19:29 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-04-13  9:11 ` [Bug middle-end/43735] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2010-04-12 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

On Linux/ia32, revision 158227 gave:

FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c  -O2 -fwhopr  execution test

Revision 158222 is OK. Revision 158225:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-04/msg00329.html

may be the cause.


-- 
           Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43735


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/43735] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c
  2010-04-12 19:29 [Bug middle-end/43735] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2010-04-13  9:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-04-13 11:31 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-13  9:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-13 09:11 -------
Confirmed.

I think the testcase is broken.  We now force always-inline functions to
be inlined during early inlining (which you can't turn off completely
now, similar to IPA inlining before the patch).  So we hit

/* IPA-SRA removes the arguments as dead, so we don't see their values, early
   inlining inlines the functions too early to test the real IPA passes (such
   as IPA-CP).  */

The testcase misses a return 0.  I don't know the guality too much, where
do the execute XPASSes / FAILs come from?

If I remove the always-inline attributes the tests all PASS / XFAIL.

If I remove the { "-fwhopr" } from the dg-xfail line all works as well.

I'm confused.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org, jamborm at gcc dot gnu
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2010-04-13 09:11:07
               date|                            |
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43735


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/43735] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c
  2010-04-12 19:29 [Bug middle-end/43735] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-04-13  9:11 ` [Bug middle-end/43735] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-13 11:31 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-04-13 11:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-04-13 11:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-13 11:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-13 11:31 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Confirmed.
> 
> I think the testcase is broken.  We now force always-inline functions to
> be inlined during early inlining (which you can't turn off completely
> now, similar to IPA inlining before the patch).  So we hit
> 
> /* IPA-SRA removes the arguments as dead, so we don't see their values, early
>    inlining inlines the functions too early to test the real IPA passes (such
>    as IPA-CP).  */
> 
> The testcase misses a return 0.  I don't know the guality too much, where
> do the execute XPASSes / FAILs come from?

As far as I remember, IPA-CP does not store the known constant values
of removed parameters in the debug info.

> 
> If I remove the always-inline attributes the tests all PASS / XFAIL.

Given the new semantics of the attribute, this is probably the right
thing to do.

> 
> If I remove the { "-fwhopr" } from the dg-xfail line all works as well.
> 

I recall that the WHOPR XPASS was also a bit of a mystery to me but I
do not remember whether I found out why it took place.  Anyway, I
believe that if you make it XFAIL, it is OK.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43735


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/43735] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c
  2010-04-12 19:29 [Bug middle-end/43735] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2010-04-13  9:11 ` [Bug middle-end/43735] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-04-13 11:31 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-13 11:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-04-13 11:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-13 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-13 11:51 -------
Subject: Bug 43735

Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 13 11:50:54 2010
New Revision: 158263

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158263
Log:
2010-04-13  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

        PR testsuite/43735
        * gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c: Remove -fwhopr XPASS.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43735


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/43735] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c
  2010-04-12 19:29 [Bug middle-end/43735] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-04-13 11:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-04-13 11:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-04-13 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-04-13 11:51 -------
Fixed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43735


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-13 11:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-12 19:29 [Bug middle-end/43735] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/inline-params.c hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2010-04-13  9:11 ` [Bug middle-end/43735] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-13 11:31 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-13 11:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-04-13 11:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).