From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13940 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2013 11:54:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12642 invoked by uid 48); 26 Apr 2013 11:54:05 -0000 From: "d.come at isae dot fr" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/43745] [avr] g++ puts VTABLES in SRAM Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:54:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: addr-space, missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: d.come at isae dot fr X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg02164.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D43745 C=C3=B4me David changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |d.come at isae dot fr --- Comment #7 from C=C3=B4me David 2013-04-26 11:5= 4:03 UTC --- Hello. I'm currently facing the exact same problem. I have a several classes with virtual methods and 50% of my RAM is taken by the vtables of these classes. I'm still willing to know if someone has come up with a solution/workaround= for this. Thank you ! >>From gcc-bugs-return-421020-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Apr 26 11:57:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10905 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2013 11:57:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10879 invoked by uid 48); 26 Apr 2013 11:57:11 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/57081] [4.9 Regression] Segmentation fault in simple_iv (tree-scalar-evolution.c:3151) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status Last reconfirmed AssignedTo Target Milestone Summary Ever Confirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg02165.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1302 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57081 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed| |2013-04-26 AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |gnu.org | Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 Summary|Segmentation fault in |[4.9 Regression] |simple_iv |Segmentation fault in |(tree-scalar-evolution.c:31 |simple_iv |51) |(tree-scalar-evolution.c:31 | |51) Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener 2013-04-26 11:57:10 UTC --- (gdb) call debug_tree (op) def_stmt version 1 in-free-list> (gdb) call debug_gimple_stmt (stmt) if (b_1 != 0) It looks at loop->bounds which are appearantly not freed by the pass creating them.