public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> @ 2010-10-18 16:14 ` tg at mirbsd dot org 2010-10-23 17:44 ` tg at mirbsd dot org ` (10 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: tg at mirbsd dot org @ 2010-10-18 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd dot org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tg at mirbsd dot org --- Comment #18 from Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd dot org> 2010-10-18 16:14:04 UTC --- I just added your patch (Attachment #20541) to my Debian source package gcc-4.4_4.4.5-3+m68k.1 – Finn Thain says it fixes that problem for him, and it does occur in compiling the debugging libstdc++ after bootstrap, so I will be able to report success (I hope) soonish. Except genattrtab takes 3.5 hours in 4.4 instead of less than half an hour in 4.3… so, it will be some days. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2010-10-18 16:14 ` [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands tg at mirbsd dot org @ 2010-10-23 17:44 ` tg at mirbsd dot org 2010-12-16 13:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (9 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: tg at mirbsd dot org @ 2010-10-23 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 --- Comment #19 from Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd dot org> 2010-10-23 17:43:59 UTC --- I could build gcc-4.4 on Debian with it, and the patch has been included into the package since. No testsuite runs with it, though – I will do it on real hardware whose usage I have been offered, but this will take a while longer. Just so you know. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2010-10-18 16:14 ` [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands tg at mirbsd dot org 2010-10-23 17:44 ` tg at mirbsd dot org @ 2010-12-16 13:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-27 11:49 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se ` (8 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-16 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|4.5.2 |4.5.3 --- Comment #20 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-16 13:03:46 UTC --- GCC 4.5.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2010-12-16 13:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-27 11:49 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-24 20:07 ` [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6/4.7 " schwab at gcc dot gnu.org ` (7 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: mikpe at it dot uu.se @ 2011-02-27 11:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #21 from Mikael Pettersson <mikpe at it dot uu.se> 2011-02-27 09:34:08 UTC --- *** Bug 47909 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2011-02-27 11:49 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se @ 2011-04-24 20:07 ` schwab at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-24 20:09 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org ` (6 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: schwab at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-24 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 --- Comment #22 from Andreas Schwab <schwab at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-24 20:04:26 UTC --- Author: schwab Date: Sun Apr 24 20:04:24 2011 New Revision: 172920 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172920 Log: Author: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@linaro.org> PR target/43804 * gcc/config/m68k/constraints.md (T): Allow PIC operands that satisfy LEGITIMATE_PIC_OPERAND_P. Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/config/m68k/constraints.md ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2011-04-24 20:07 ` [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6/4.7 " schwab at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-24 20:09 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2011-04-28 15:53 ` [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (5 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2011-04-24 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to work| |4.7.0 --- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> 2011-04-24 20:05:46 UTC --- Fixed for 4.7. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2011-04-24 20:09 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2011-04-28 15:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01 19:36 ` tg at mirbsd dot org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-04-28 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|4.5.3 |4.5.4 --- Comment #24 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-28 14:51:53 UTC --- GCC 4.5.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2011-04-28 15:53 ` [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-07-01 19:36 ` tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-07-26 20:17 ` tg at mirbsd dot org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: tg at mirbsd dot org @ 2011-07-01 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 --- Comment #25 from Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd dot org> 2011-07-01 19:36:06 UTC --- Applied the diff from svn r172920 to the Debian gcc-4.6 source package as well; let’s see whether this works. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (7 preceding siblings ...) 2011-07-01 19:36 ` tg at mirbsd dot org @ 2011-07-26 20:17 ` tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-09-04 18:03 ` leopardboy2 at yahoo dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 11 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: tg at mirbsd dot org @ 2011-07-26 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 --- Comment #26 from Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd dot org> 2011-07-26 20:16:22 UTC --- Both gcc-4.4 and gcc-4.6 with that patch applied compile memtest.i properly. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (8 preceding siblings ...) 2011-07-26 20:17 ` tg at mirbsd dot org @ 2011-09-04 18:03 ` leopardboy2 at yahoo dot com 2012-07-02 14:03 ` [Bug target/43804] [4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-12 16:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 11 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: leopardboy2 at yahoo dot com @ 2011-09-04 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 leopardboy2 at yahoo dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leopardboy2 at yahoo dot | |com --- Comment #27 from leopardboy2 at yahoo dot com 2011-09-04 18:02:22 UTC --- I had the same failure on GCC 4.6 ( 4.6 branch as of 9/03/2011) cross building for m68k. I added the proposed patch from above and rebuilt GCC and it fixed it... Can this fix get put into the 4.6 branch also? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (9 preceding siblings ...) 2011-09-04 18:03 ` leopardboy2 at yahoo dot com @ 2012-07-02 14:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-12 16:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 11 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-02 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.6.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ` (10 preceding siblings ...) 2012-07-02 14:03 ` [Bug target/43804] [4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-04-12 16:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 11 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-04-12 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.0 --- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-12 16:18:06 UTC --- The 4.6 branch has been closed, fixed in GCC 4.7.0. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/43804] New: [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands @ 2010-04-19 20:11 schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-05-02 18:02 ` [Bug target/43804] " mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (7 more replies) 0 siblings, 8 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: schwab at linux-m68k dot org @ 2010-04-19 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1564 bytes --] $ gcc/xgcc -Bgcc/ -O2 -fpic -S memusage.i memusage.c: In function me: memusage.c:311:1: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints: (insn 342 136 137 10 memusage.c:253 (set (reg/f:SI 2 %d2 [137]) (const:SI (unspec:SI [ (symbol_ref:SI ("start_sp") [flags 0x1a] <var_decl 0x40322ea0 start_sp>) (const_int 2 [0x2]) ] 6))) 36 {*movsi_m68k} (nil)) memusage.c:311:1: internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:396 Caused by: commit e38def9ca7953bb5611d08ce8617249516ba5a99 Author: rth <rth@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> Date: Mon Sep 14 19:18:58 2009 +0000 Squash commit of EH in gimple git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@151696 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 75333c1..cc04831 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,343 @@ +2009-09-14 Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> + + * except.h: Update declarations. + (struct pointer_map_t): Forward declare. + (ERT_UNKNOWN, ERT_THROW, ERT_CATCH): Remove. -- Summary: [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: schwab at linux-m68k dot org GCC target triplet: m68k-linux-* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands 2010-04-19 20:11 [Bug rtl-optimization/43804] New: [4.5/4.6 " schwab at linux-m68k dot org @ 2010-05-02 18:02 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-02 18:04 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (6 subsequent siblings) 7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-02 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #11 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-02 18:02 ------- Created an attachment (id=20536) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20536&action=view) Revert previous patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands 2010-04-19 20:11 [Bug rtl-optimization/43804] New: [4.5/4.6 " schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-05-02 18:02 ` [Bug target/43804] " mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-02 18:04 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-03 9:53 ` rdsandiford at googlemail dot com ` (5 subsequent siblings) 7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-02 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #12 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-02 18:03 ------- Ping. Richard S., Andreas, Any comment on the above analysis? AFAICT, the "T" constraint should accept operands if "flag_pic && !TARGET_PCREL". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands 2010-04-19 20:11 [Bug rtl-optimization/43804] New: [4.5/4.6 " schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-05-02 18:02 ` [Bug target/43804] " mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-02 18:04 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-03 9:53 ` rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2010-05-03 9:55 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: rdsandiford at googlemail dot com @ 2010-05-03 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #13 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2010-05-03 09:53 ------- Subject: Re: [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands "mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes: > ------- Comment #10 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-23 10:20 ------- > The problem seems to be in Richard's patch > (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/130602) checked in r120961. > > All and all, it seems that revision 120961 should be reverted to enable 'T' > constraint for (flag_pic && !TARGET_PCREL). > > The 's' constraint is defined as > == > case 's': > if (CONST_INT_P (op) > || (GET_CODE (op) == CONST_DOUBLE > && GET_MODE (op) == VOIDmode)) > break; > case 'i': > if (CONSTANT_P (op)) > win = 1; > break; > == > > So, unless I'm missing something, the statement > "... 's' doesn't accept anything if flag_pic" > is just wrong. I meant "flag_pic && !TARGET_PCREL", since only the !TARGET_PCREL case matters for 'T'. And that was right at the time that I wrote it. The interesting definition of 's' isn't the one you quote, but the one in reload: case 's': if (CONST_INT_P (operand) || (GET_CODE (operand) == CONST_DOUBLE && GET_MODE (operand) == VOIDmode)) break; case 'i': if (CONSTANT_P (operand) && (! flag_pic || LEGITIMATE_PIC_OPERAND_P (operand))) win = 1; break; That is, 's' operands have to satisfy LEGITIMATE_PIC_OPERAND_P when generating PIC. I'm not sure which version you were quoting, but if it was constrain_operands, that's a special case. constrain_operands can rely on the predicates to check for legitimate PIC operands, so there's no need to repeat the check there. At the time I committed the patch, LEGITIMATE_PIC_OPERAND_P was defined as follows: #define LEGITIMATE_PIC_OPERAND_P(X) \ (!symbolic_operand (X, VOIDmode) \ || (TARGET_PCREL && REG_STRICT_P)) Thus no symbolic constant was a legitimate PIC operand for flag_pic && !TARGET_PCREL. Thus nothing satisfied 's' when flag_pic && !TARGET_PCREL. The 'T' constraint is defined as follows: satisifies(T) == satisifies(s) && !TARGET_PCREL so it followed that nothing should match 'T' when flag_pic. So the patch was correct at the time it was committed. Please understand that reverting it is the wrong thing to do. It would reintroduce the original bug: that constraints _must not_ match something that the associated predicates do not. Only the other way is allowed: predicates can allow things that the constraints don't, within certain limits. For example, let's say you have an insn that matches: (define_insn "subsi3" [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=mda,m,d,a") (minus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "general_operand" "0,0,0,0") (match_operand:SI 2 "general_src_operand" "I,dT,mSrT,mSrs")))] "" "@ subq%.l %2, %0 sub%.l %2,%0 sub%.l %2,%0 sub%.l %2,%0" [(set_attr "type" "aluq_l,alu_l,alu_l,alu_l") (set_attr "opy" "2")]) And let's suppose that operand 2 is a register that is equal to: (symbol_ref "x") If 'T' allows any CONST, SYMBOL_REF or LABEL_REF when flag_pic && !TARGET_PCREL (as in your suggested patch), reload could quite happily establish that operand 2 is (symbol_ref "x"), see that it matches 'T', and use it. This will then lead to an unrecognisable insn, because although the constant matches the 'T' constraint, it doesn't match general_src_operand. Instead, the bug is that the 'T' constraint wasn't updated by the TLS support at the same time as LEGITIMATE_PIC_OPERAND_P was. An easy thing to miss, of course. I think the correct patch is the one I'm about to attach. Richard -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands 2010-04-19 20:11 [Bug rtl-optimization/43804] New: [4.5/4.6 " schwab at linux-m68k dot org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2010-05-03 9:53 ` rdsandiford at googlemail dot com @ 2010-05-03 9:55 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-03 20:17 ` schwab at linux-m68k dot org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-03 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #14 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-03 09:55 ------- Created an attachment (id=20541) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20541&action=view) proposed patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands 2010-04-19 20:11 [Bug rtl-optimization/43804] New: [4.5/4.6 " schwab at linux-m68k dot org ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2010-05-03 9:55 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-03 20:17 ` schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-05-10 19:49 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: schwab at linux-m68k dot org @ 2010-05-03 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #15 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-05-03 20:17 ------- The patch is ok, please check it in. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands 2010-04-19 20:11 [Bug rtl-optimization/43804] New: [4.5/4.6 " schwab at linux-m68k dot org ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2010-05-03 20:17 ` schwab at linux-m68k dot org @ 2010-05-10 19:49 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 12:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 9:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-10 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #16 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-10 19:49 ------- Thanks Andreas. I don't have access to m68k-elfy targets these days, so could someone test it just to be sure? I'll commit if everything goes OK. -- rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-05-10 19:49:34 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands 2010-04-19 20:11 [Bug rtl-optimization/43804] New: [4.5/4.6 " schwab at linux-m68k dot org ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2010-05-10 19:49 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-19 12:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 9:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-19 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands 2010-04-19 20:11 [Bug rtl-optimization/43804] New: [4.5/4.6 " schwab at linux-m68k dot org ` (6 preceding siblings ...) 2010-05-19 12:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-31 9:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-07-31 9:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 09:29 ------- GCC 4.5.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|4.5.1 |4.5.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-12 16:18 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <bug-43804-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2010-10-18 16:14 ` [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands tg at mirbsd dot org 2010-10-23 17:44 ` tg at mirbsd dot org 2010-12-16 13:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-27 11:49 ` mikpe at it dot uu.se 2011-04-24 20:07 ` [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6/4.7 " schwab at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-24 20:09 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2011-04-28 15:53 ` [Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-01 19:36 ` tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-07-26 20:17 ` tg at mirbsd dot org 2011-09-04 18:03 ` leopardboy2 at yahoo dot com 2012-07-02 14:03 ` [Bug target/43804] [4.6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-12 16:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-04-19 20:11 [Bug rtl-optimization/43804] New: [4.5/4.6 " schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-05-02 18:02 ` [Bug target/43804] " mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-02 18:04 ` mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-03 9:53 ` rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2010-05-03 9:55 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-03 20:17 ` schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2010-05-10 19:49 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-19 12:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 9:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).