From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8704 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2011 17:58:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 8695 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Oct 2011 17:58:22 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_BG X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:58:09 +0000 From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/43829] Scalarization of reductions Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2011 17:58:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00596.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 --- Comment #43 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-08 17:57:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #39) > Thanks. One comment: I think you will increase the binary size by inlining the > reduction. Could you consider keeping the current libgfortran version and > protecting the scalarization by > if (!optimize_size) > This is included in the patch in comment #41. Unfortunately, it makes the test (comment #42) fail with -Os in the testsuite. I don't know yet how I will handle it. I would like to avoid forcing one optimization level if possible. Any idea?