From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-316116-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13849 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2010 17:45:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 13730 invoked by uid 48); 26 Apr 2010 17:45:16 -0000
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:45:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug lto/43898]  New: -flto -g: "tree check: expected class 'type', have 'declaration'"
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-43898-19090@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "max at duempel dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg02756.txt.bz2

With "-flto -g", the following source will bail out with an internal compiler
error:

 void bug() {
   struct Class {
     Class(int a) {}
     virtual void f() {}
   };
   Class a(0);
 }

Command line: g++-4.5 -g -flto bug.cxx

Error message:

 bug.cxx: In member function 'bug()::Class::f()':
 bug.cxx:4:23: internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'type', have
'declaration' (function_decl) in gen_type_die_with_usage, at dwarf2out.c:18962
 Please submit a full bug report,
 with preprocessed source if appropriate.
 See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.5/README.Bugs> for instructions.

Compiler version: gcc version 4.5.1 20100419 (prerelease) (Debian 4.5.0-2)


-- 
           Summary: -flto -g: "tree check: expected class 'type', have
                    'declaration'"
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: lto
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: max at duempel dot org
 GCC build triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43898